Event 10 format information and score reporting Broze wins the event. #nofeed
#183
Posted 2017-September-03, 09:50
Heart76 - toast1 : 16 - 40
http://webutil.bridg...92515&u=heart76
Heart76 - leeky123 : 23 - 21
http://webutil.bridg...70372&u=heart76
http://webutil.bridg...92515&u=heart76
Heart76 - leeky123 : 23 - 21
http://webutil.bridg...70372&u=heart76
#184
Posted 2017-September-03, 10:48
I played pio_magic and after playing the last hand, the results popped up, but wouldn't load onto a page where I could copy and paste the results to here. Waited about 45 minutes, and now the results aren't in my recent tournament file. Each of the hands are in recent hands though, and I can see what the total was (I won 46-21) but I can't prove it here, maybe he could post the total page for me, or someone could help me figure out how to find it. Thanks
#188
Posted 2017-September-03, 13:07
@barmar can you check results of people who didn't post hand record link?
@everyone please make sure you post the hand record link or any proof (e.g. screen shot) if the link is not available. Make sure you finish on time. Don't start the match if it's about to expire, resend the challenge instead.
@everyone please make sure you post the hand record link or any proof (e.g. screen shot) if the link is not available. Make sure you finish on time. Don't start the match if it's about to expire, resend the challenge instead.
#189
Posted 2017-September-03, 13:40
Sry. Im playing & posting in smrtph w brokenglass so hardy copypaste link. A lot of miscl...)):
#191
Posted 2017-September-03, 17:34
gqc6 16-27 broze
http://webutil.bridg...04379364&u=gqc6
gqc6 24-18 Hrothgar
http://webutil.bridg...04436773&u=gqc6
http://webutil.bridg...04379364&u=gqc6
gqc6 24-18 Hrothgar
http://webutil.bridg...04436773&u=gqc6
#193
Posted 2017-September-03, 19:43
smerriman, on 2017-September-02, 20:04, said:
Ah. In that case, no idea. My calculations shows a diamond lead averages over 1 IMP better than a heart lead on both auctions.
It's possible that your simulation uses somewhat different criteria for the hands that will jump directly to 3NT vs. invite than GIB's dealer. Or it could just be due to the number of hands you use versus GIB -- it uses only a few dozen because it has to make a decision in real time.
#195
Posted 2017-September-03, 20:07
leeky123 24 - 25 twisterrz http://webutil.bridg...7180&u=leeky123
leeky123 68 - 20 shuba http://webutil.bridg...0035&u=leeky123
leeky123 68 - 20 shuba http://webutil.bridg...0035&u=leeky123
#196
Posted 2017-September-03, 20:24
barmar, on 2017-September-03, 19:43, said:
It's possible that your simulation uses somewhat different criteria for the hands that will jump directly to 3NT vs. invite than GIB's dealer. Or it could just be due to the number of hands you use versus GIB -- it uses only a few dozen because it has to make a decision in real time.
OK, yup - the criteria should be pretty straightforward in this instance, but if I have them right and it only simulates 30 hands, then there's about a 7% chance the results of its simulations will tell it the diamond is better. (That's using random sampling, though I presume GIB uses some form of importance sampling). So unlikely, but still large enough to happen regularly.
(Sorry frank0, will stop taking this thread off-topic now!)
#197
Posted 2017-September-03, 21:00
okay, hand result finally loaded for me to post
Stoppiello 10 - gqc6 18
http://webutil.bridg...94&u=stoppiello
Stoppiello 46 - pio_magic 21
http://webutil.bridg...80&u=stoppiello
Stoppiello 10 - gqc6 18
http://webutil.bridg...94&u=stoppiello
Stoppiello 46 - pio_magic 21
http://webutil.bridg...80&u=stoppiello