BBO Discussion Forums: MP Defense - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

MP Defense

#1 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,093
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-March-01, 22:03

Scoring: MP


1 - 1N - 2 - 3 - 4

Pard leads the 4 (4th) and your Ace drops declarer's K. Over to you.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#2 User is offline   awm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,696
  • Joined: 2005-February-09
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Zurich, Switzerland

Posted 2009-March-01, 22:55

I'd just continue hearts. If partner has something like Qxxx and club ace, this might even beat the hand.

It's certainly possible that we need to switch to diamonds in order to get our diamond tricks, but I don't see a compelling reason that this is more likely than the above construction.
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
0

#3 User is offline   sathyab 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 575
  • Joined: 2006-November-07

Posted 2009-March-01, 23:26

I'm switching to a . If declarer's trumps are only as good as AJTxxx, the danger is that declarer may have Axx. Partner has to cash out in this situation when he gets his last trump trick instead of continuing a forcing defense then. But alternatively if declarer's trumps are really good, he may pull trumps and KO partner's club stopper when he still has the K entry.
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..."
0

#4 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-March-02, 04:32

Even if declarer has AJ9x diamond return doesn't cost a trick since he can discard at least 1 diamond in dummy's clubs whatever he's got.

I said the above just so this is not a 1 liner post, because I thinkadam and sathy said almost everythng already. I would lead a heart at the table, but feel inclined to lead a diamond because it is a problem.
0

#5 User is offline   Codo 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,373
  • Joined: 2003-March-15
  • Location:Hamburg, Germany
  • Interests:games and sports, esp. bridge,chess and (beach-)volleyball

Posted 2009-March-02, 05:05

on-liner: Agree with Gonzalo
Kind Regards

Roland


Sanity Check: Failure (Fluffy)
More system is not the answer...
0

#6 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,093
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-March-05, 22:18

The tap was best by a mile. Declarer held: QJT9xx, K, AJxx, Qx.

I shifted to a diamond. I needed to think about this more.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#7 User is offline   sathyab 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 575
  • Joined: 2006-November-07

Posted 2009-March-05, 23:02

Phil, on Mar 5 2009, 11:18 PM, said:

The tap was best by a mile. Declarer held: QJT9xx, K, AJxx, Qx.

I shifted to a diamond. I needed to think about this more.

This hand is nearly the same strength and shape I had in mind for the shift, AQJxxx K Jxxx Qx. But I think the hand declarer actually held looks like a better one to accept the invite than the one I imagined, as Jxxx could easily be weak point. A lot of players would bid 4 with QJTxxx K AJxx Qx, but not sure how many would pass with AQJxxx K Jxxx Qx.
Seeking input from anyone who doesn't frequently "wtp", "Lol" or post to merely "Agree with ..."
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users