BBO Discussion Forums: Tricky slam to play - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Tricky slam to play NS vul teams

#1 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,303
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2012-March-24, 03:16



Dealer W who opens 2♦ explained as acol 8 playing tricks
N doubles
E bids 4♦ (weak aceless raise)
S bids 4♥
W passes
N bids 6♥

W leads ♠6

You know the W player, and know that he plays a multi in every partnership other than this one.

Take it from here.
0

#2 User is offline   BunnyGo 

  • Lamentable Bunny
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,505
  • Joined: 2008-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, ME

Posted 2012-March-24, 03:33

View PostCyberyeti, on 2012-March-24, 03:16, said:



Dealer W who opens 2♦ explained as acol 8 playing tricks



Sorry, what does this mean? Is it a diamond oriented hand with 8 tricks? Is it any hand (perhaps some suit or NT) with 8 tricks?
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34

Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
0

#3 User is offline   BunnyGo 

  • Lamentable Bunny
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,505
  • Joined: 2008-March-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portland, ME

Posted 2012-March-24, 03:34

Oh, and there's no way this has anything to do with your other post about obligations...right? ;)
Bridge Personality: 44 44 43 34

Never tell the same lie twice. - Elim Garek on the real moral of "The boy who cried wolf"
0

#4 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,303
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2012-March-24, 03:51

View PostBunnyGo, on 2012-March-24, 03:34, said:

Oh, and there's no way this has anything to do with your other post about obligations...right? ;)

This has everything to do with that, but is still an interesting play problem if you don't actually look at the hand posted there. But you can assume that W has forgotten that he doesn't play a multi in this partnership and has a weak 2 in spades, but to make sense of E's 4♦, you have to realise that he's responding to an acol 2, ie a decent hand of opening strength plus that expects to make 8 tricks opposite a yarborough with ♦ xx.
0

#5 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2012-March-24, 13:43

I finesse at trick one, because that allows me to take a safety play in trumps.

♠J, ♥K, ♥ to the 8 unless East plays an honour. If hearts are 3-2, I have twelve tricks including one club ruff. If East has ♥QJxx and doesn't split, I cash a third heart, then cash my winners and eventually ruff a club.

If East splits from ♥QJxx, I win, then play ♦AK, ♣A, ♦Q throwing a club, club ruff, reaching this position:


East has ♥Q6 left.
I lead dummy's top spades, planning to throw two clubs. Assuming that East was 1444, 1453 or 1435, it doesn't matter what he does - if he ruffs the first spade low I overruff, ruff a club (to which he will follow), and lead the other top spade; if he discards on the first spade and ruffs the second spade low, I overruff and ruff my last club; if he never ruffs I have a crossruff.

This line fails if the shapes are 6115-1462. I'll know about this after the second round of diamonds, but I haven't yet decided what I'd do about it.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users