Multi sequence What sounds right?
#1
Posted 2012-July-21, 22:46
I have seen people using the 2♠ response in mainly the same way; some people say 2♠ shows an 'invitational' hand with hearts, which roughly means that if opener holds the hearts s/he should get to 4. Some people just say that 2♠ is just another pass/correct bid that can be used when opener 'knows' partner holds spades and not hearts (usually with hearts, for if opener has to show the red Major s/he needs to get to 3). I have even seen people bid 2♠ with 1-2 in the Majors and a poor hand. I think 2♠ should be bid with (and I usually bid it with) 5 hearts.
Anyway, today someone received the following collection:
♠T9x
♥J8xxxx
♦xx
♣xx
Now, would you bid 2♥ or 2♠ with it?
If partner opened in fourth seat, would you bid 2♥ or 2♠?
Finally, at my table the bidding went:
Pa-Pa-Pa-2♦
Pa-2♠-Pa-2NT*
Pa-4♦**-Pa-4NT***
Pa-5♦-Pa-5♥
Pa-Pa-Pa
*22-23 balanced
**Texas transfer
***Key Card
This contract went down one. Of course we're missing the strong hand but, who would you blame?
wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:
rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:
My YouTube Channel
#2
Posted 2012-July-21, 23:13
#3
Posted 2012-July-22, 00:00
As for the 5♥ hand. Shoot opener.
Here is the issue. 2♠ was correct bid. You are willing to go high in hearts with a fit, but you actually know partner has the big balanced hand when it goes pass pass pass to him (otherwise where it the points). So bidding 2♠ now also happily means he can declarer the hand.
When he bids 2NT over your 2♠, i assume you play both jacoby and texas. So 4♦ is not inviting him to do ANYTHING OTHER THAN BID 4♥. If you wanted to invite him to consider going beyond 4♥, you would have bid 3♦, then raised 3♥ to 4♥. There is no way that a person who has descibed his hand as 22-23 hcp can possibly have anything in his opening bid to make it right for him to over-ride the normal texas transfer bid. 4NT (WHAT EVER IT IS) is a total lack of partnership discipline.
#4
Posted 2012-July-22, 14:41
#6
Posted 2012-July-22, 17:23
Even so, opener should let responder control the hand. There's no way for opener to know just what responder holds, so the 4 NT bid is insane.
I think inquiry's response makes perfect sense. I agree that any move by the big hand over 4 ♦ other than 4 ♥ is a gross breach of partnership trust.
#7
Posted 2012-July-22, 17:27
inquiry, on 2012-July-22, 00:00, said:
Here is the issue. 2♠ was correct bid. You are willing to go high in hearts with a fit, but you actually know partner has the big balanced hand when it goes pass pass pass to him (otherwise where it the points). So bidding 2♠ now also happily means he can declarer the hand.
When he bids 2NT over your 2♠, i assume you play both jacoby and texas. So 4♦ is not inviting him to do ANYTHING OTHER THAN BID 4♥. If you wanted to invite him to consider going beyond 4♥, you would have bid 3♦, then raised 3♥ to 4♥. There is no way that a person who has descibed his hand as 22-23 hcp can possibly have anything in his opening bid to make it right for him to over-ride the normal texas transfer bid. 4NT (WHAT EVER IT IS) is a total lack of partnership discipline.
Agree 100% with this. And I like how, to really emphasise the point, inquiry has even capitalised the "HE" between square brackets (to make a ♥ symbol) in "ANYTHING OTHER THAN BID 4♥", where all his other suit symbols are lower-case
ahydra
#8
Posted 2012-July-23, 03:03
#9
Posted 2012-July-23, 10:43
2♠ is a wimpy bid. 3♠ is my call on this hand, unless your multi weak-2s can be crappy 5-carders. Somebody has a 22-point hand, and if it's my LHO, 2♠ is going to get them to bid 2NT and they'll actually find which game they want. If it's partner, we'll have a nice texas auction to 4♥. If it's my RHO, then it won't be a 22-count; it'll be whatever is the "pass-and-double" hand, and 2♠ isn't going to be enough, especially as LHO's got something, too.
Having said that, I can do nothing but echo all the cheers for inquiry. 2♦-3♠; 3NT-4♦; 4♥ - wait, 4NT? what's that?
#10
Posted 2012-July-23, 10:53
#11
Posted 2012-July-23, 10:56
mycroft, on 2012-July-23, 10:43, said:
2♠ is a wimpy bid. 3♠ is my call on this hand, unless your multi weak-2s can be crappy 5-carders. Somebody has a 22-point hand,
After 3 passes to your partner in 4th seat, which opponent do you think passed with a 22 point hand?