BBO Discussion Forums: Matchpoint fight (or lack of it) - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Matchpoint fight (or lack of it)

#21 User is offline   TimG 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,972
  • Joined: 2004-July-25
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Maine, USA

Posted 2012-November-14, 16:06

View PostArtK78, on 2012-November-13, 09:56, said:

I know that many partnerships used to play that it is systemically not permitted to let the opponents play in 2 of a major in a competitive auction at matchpoints. I don't see much of that anymore (at least I don't see it marked on convention cards anymore as a partnership agreement), but while that style has its drawbacks, this hand is not one of them.

General Bridge Knowledge.
0

#22 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2012-November-14, 16:29

View PostTimG, on 2012-November-14, 16:06, said:

General Bridge Knowledge.

There is a difference between knowing that it is a good idea to bid 3 over 2 (which you might occasionally choose not to do) and having a partnership agreement that you MUST bid 3 over 2.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users