BBO Discussion Forums: Go slamming? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Go slamming? At least you won't have trump losers

#1 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-February-02, 21:49


Matchpoints. Do you look for slam and how?
0

#2 User is offline   rmnka447 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,366
  • Joined: 2012-March-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Illinois
  • Interests:Bridge, Golf, Soccer

Posted 2013-February-03, 00:34

No, the original negative double promises about opening values if you have only 4 ♥s. The hand is really not that much more than a minimum range opener. Opener did have the chance to show extras by jumping to game in ♥ or cueing 3 ♠ and didn't. Pard could have as little as ♠ x ♥ xxxx ♦ AQx ♣ AJxxx. So unless pard makes some noise over 4 ♥, game is enough.
0

#3 User is offline   Antrax 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,458
  • Joined: 2011-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2013-February-03, 00:59

View Postrmnka447, on 2013-February-03, 00:34, said:

No, the original negative double promises about opening values if you have only 4 ♥s.
Thanks - this makes perfect sense but I've never thought about it like this.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users