BBO Discussion Forums: ATB: They played undoubled - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

ATB: They played undoubled And we had a game...

#1 User is online   Hanoi5 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,082
  • Joined: 2006-August-31
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Santiago, Chile
  • Interests:Bridge, Video Games, Languages, Travelling.

Posted 2013-January-23, 21:40



MP's. 5 spades can be made. 3NT went down only one. If 3NT was doubled they'd surely take it out to 4♣ which makes. Who could have done something in the bidding?

 wyman, on 2012-May-04, 09:48, said:

Also, he rates to not have a heart void when he leads the ♥3.


 rbforster, on 2012-May-20, 21:04, said:

Besides playing for fun, most people also like to play bridge to win


My YouTube Channel
0

#2 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2013-January-23, 21:46

Defense is the culprit. Your side should take the first 10 tricks against 3N, for +600. Edit: Why are you trying to go +450 instead?

This post has been edited by Bbradley62: 2013-January-24, 07:23

0

#3 User is offline   bigbenvic 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 317
  • Joined: 2011-October-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Melbourne, Australia

Posted 2013-January-23, 23:13

 Hanoi5, on 2013-January-23, 21:40, said:



MP's. 5 spades can be made. 3NT went down only one. If 3NT was doubled they'd surely take it out to 4♣ which makes. Who could have done something in the bidding?

For me west 100% he's been very reluctant to bid game and I'm not sure why? He has a 10 count 4 trumps and a void in openers suit opposite partners 1 level overcall.

I'm not sure why he's bidding 3♣ I'd bid 4♦ (1 loser suit 9+ cards in ♠+♦ with at least 3♠) this is both lead directional (if we whack 5♣) and allowing partner to compete on if we have a good doublefit (ie when the Law gets higher)

Having bid 3♣ I'd still bid over 3NT 4♠ is probably the simplest but if 4♦ would show a suit having already agreed ♠ ... Probably too confusing so I'd probably just bid game.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users