mikeh, on 2013-February-01, 17:15, said:
Wrong forum: put it in the non-natural section.
I'm an expert, or so I like to think, and I have never played nor played against the options that you are asking us to consider instead of the pedestrian 1♠.
It seems to me that one cannot really answer your question without at least some experience of or discussion concerning how the auction goes, after your more esoteric beginnings, should the opps be rude enough to bid, especially the multi type.
Gadgets that work magnificently when the opps promise to stay out sometimes run onto the rocks when the opps disrupt, even if you have good agreements....and I can't recall how often I've seen players get into a nightmare scenario when confronted with an enemy action they either hadn't discussed or about which one of them forgets the agreement. I remember collecting 2300 once in our national team trial on such an event, admittedly against one of the weaker teams in the field.
Thanks for the answer mikeh.
The question comes from a discussion of another pair at the bar.
One person of that pair opened 2
♦, to show a GF with
♠. The other person said that he should have shown the 2-suiter with better
♠ then
♣.
I said that
♠ are so good that I would treat it as single suiter, but would rather open 1
♠ and bid it slowly (hoping to get DBLed at MPs).
So if you can choose (to eliminate possible opps preempts):
- 3
♠=GF with
♠
- 3NT=GF with
♠&
♣; better
♠ then
♣
- 1
♠
=> How would you order these choices?