kenberg, on 2013-February-16, 16:13, said:
All of this may be true, I don't know a lot about it. But the case in question does not address any of these issues. The farmer does not want to stop using Mosanto products, he simply wants to get them on the cheap.
Are seeds produced by plants grown from Monsanto seeds also "Monsanto products?" What about seeds produced by hybrids containing genetic material from seeds created by more than one corporation? How much should patent protection infringe upon the rights of legal buyers of those seeds?
Monsanto argues -- and lower courts have agreed -- that the normal patent exhaustion restrictions don't apply to Monsanto's seeds. I hope that the Supreme Court restores common sense in this matter. And I doubt that the court would have agreed to hear the case if there were no chance of that.
BOWMAN v. MONSANTO
Of course Monsanto could have used contracts to enforce its wishes, but has chosen to rely upon patent infringement instead. Is a farmer who has violated no agreement with Monsanto nevertheless subject to extortion by means of an unreasonable extension of patent protection? I guess we will find out.