BBO Discussion Forums: Third Hand High - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Third Hand High

#1 User is offline   Bbradley62 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,542
  • Joined: 2010-February-01
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Brooklyn, NY, USA

Posted 2014-August-01, 17:32

I know; North got confused by the bidding, because South must have three diamonds (and must have chosen a non-standard lead), but this is one of those situations that would be covered by the general rules we've talked about for playing high or playing low.

And, it appears to be the case that "XX implies no fit" means 4-♣, so I presume 2NT Truscott/Jordan would show 5+♣. Why should this be different than showing support vs not if the opponent had passed? Direct raises of minors should always show 5+.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users