Help
Matchpoints 3rd in favourable opps aren't great but lefty is considerably better than righty
two passes to you
75432
5
6
AQJT86
you play 2/1 3 weak 2
cheers
Eagles
Page 1 of 1
5116
#1
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,831
- Joined: 2011-June-08
- Gender:Male
- Location:UK Near London
- Interests:Crystal Palace
Posted 2015-August-03, 09:55
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
#2
- VIP Member
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 6,971
- Joined: 2009-November-14
- Gender:Male
- Location:Houston, TX
Posted 2015-August-03, 10:18
Call me primitive but I pass.
-5 card spades on the side is way too much for me to open 3♣.
-1♣ opening is not even a lead director.
-My hand perfectly fits in the definition of a pass.
-5 card spades on the side is way too much for me to open 3♣.
-1♣ opening is not even a lead director.
-My hand perfectly fits in the definition of a pass.
"Genius has its own limitations, however stupidity has no such boundaries!"
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
"It's only when a mosquito lands on your testicles that you realize there is always a way to solve problems without using violence!"
"Well to be perfectly honest, in my humble opinion, of course without offending anyone who thinks differently from my point of view, but also by looking into this matter in a different perspective and without being condemning of one's view's and by trying to make it objectified, and by considering each and every one's valid opinion, I honestly believe that I completely forgot what I was going to say."
#3
- Experimental biddicist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,909
- Joined: 2010-January-02
- Gender:Male
Posted 2015-August-03, 11:31
I will bid 3♣, giving up on 4♠, since I can't see any sensible way to get there.
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,660
- Joined: 2011-February-12
Posted 2015-August-03, 12:01
3c
Not much defense p is a passed hand and aiming for spades is a super small tiny window to worry about. It is all too easy for the opps to have game if not slam and at the very worst 3c is a decent lead director. Passing under these conditions is a head-in-the-sand philosophy:)
Not much defense p is a passed hand and aiming for spades is a super small tiny window to worry about. It is all too easy for the opps to have game if not slam and at the very worst 3c is a decent lead director. Passing under these conditions is a head-in-the-sand philosophy:)
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 7,786
- Joined: 2004-September-05
- Gender:Male
- Location:Galloway NJ USA
-
Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.
Posted 2015-August-03, 13:05
I open 3♣.
In third seat after 2 passes, my goal is to disrupt the opps as much as possible without sticking my neck out too far. 3♣ accomplishes this.
It is not my goal to find the best possible contract, but rather the best contract possible. Could we have a spade fit? Sure we could. But it is impractical to look for it.
In third seat after 2 passes, my goal is to disrupt the opps as much as possible without sticking my neck out too far. 3♣ accomplishes this.
It is not my goal to find the best possible contract, but rather the best contract possible. Could we have a spade fit? Sure we could. But it is impractical to look for it.
#6
- Experimental biddicist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,909
- Joined: 2010-January-02
- Gender:Male
Posted 2015-August-03, 14:51
I'm now thinking that given all the people voting for 3♣, I should probably have said 4♣. I have a reputation to uphold 
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
#7
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,130
- Joined: 2014-June-01
Posted 2015-August-03, 15:43
I'm not supposed to have a side 4c-M when opening 3m but I'm in 3rd and 5432 are so tiny vs my AQJT876. Oops I messed up again with those black pips!
#8
- 5-level belongs to me
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,128
- Joined: 2004-August-30
- Gender:Male
- Location:Glasgow Scotland
- Interests:Poems Computers
Posted 2015-August-03, 18:16
eagles123, on 2015-August-03, 09:55, said:
Matchpoints 3rd in favourable opps aren't great but lefty is considerably better than righty. two passes to you
♠ 7 5 4 3 2 ♥ 5 ♦ 6 ♣ A Q J T 8 6
you play 2/1 3 weak 2
♠ 7 5 4 3 2 ♥ 5 ♦ 6 ♣ A Q J T 8 6
you play 2/1 3 weak 2
- 3♣ = PRE. ♠ holding no bar to 3rd-seat pre-empt.
- Pass = NAT. Gives opponents a lot of exploration room.
#9
- Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 9,586
- Joined: 2005-September-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
- Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor
Posted 2015-August-03, 19:00
3C, with 1C also considered. 1C leaves options, and a HCP misdirection may be as effective as a preempt.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#10
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,576
- Joined: 2009-May-18
- Location:Oz
Posted 2015-August-03, 20:21
An ex-partner long ago tried 4S with this sort of a hand (mixing up a suggestion about what to do with a good 6 card major and weak 5 card minor). Easy +420.
Partner's a world champion now, so who am I to argue?
Partner's a world champion now, so who am I to argue?
#11
- Group: Members
- Posts: 30
- Joined: 2015-February-25
Posted 2015-August-03, 23:28
Spades are too weak to show, as lead in this suit is not what we'd like to got. I understand 3c, but if the opponents have unbalanced hands, it won't stop them from finding the game in hearts. That's why I would bid 1h.
#12
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,728
- Joined: 2003-March-07
- Gender:Male
- Location:Laos
- Interests:Wagner and Bridge
Posted 2015-August-04, 03:09
1S. Why should a 3rd seat opening be lead directing? 3C is a really silly opening with 5S as well. Second choice is pass, but I like to get in here.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
#13
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,488
- Joined: 2006-March-23
- Gender:Male
Posted 2015-August-04, 08:20
4C
The artist formerly known as jlall
#14
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 12,029
- Joined: 2009-February-21
- Gender:Male
- Location:St. George, UT
Posted 2015-August-04, 08:29
PhantomSac, on 2015-August-04, 08:20, said:
4C
We knew that vote. Unfortunately, I am systemically barred from 4♣, so would have to settle for 3.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#15
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,831
- Joined: 2011-June-08
- Gender:Male
- Location:UK Near London
- Interests:Crystal Palace
Posted 2015-August-04, 08:39
PhantomSac, on 2015-August-04, 08:20, said:
4C
looks like you're going to have to change your vote to 5c now, Jinksy
btw this hand was from a couple of weeks ago I opened 3c fwiw I was just thinking about it yesterday for some reason
full hand for those interested:
https://app.pianola....3/Travellers/25
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
#16
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 3,952
- Joined: 2008-June-23
- Gender:Male
Posted 2015-August-04, 10:08
MrAce, on 2015-August-03, 10:18, said:
Call me primitive but I pass.
-5 card spades on the side is way too much for me to open 3♣.
-1♣ opening is not even a lead director.
-My hand perfectly fits in the definition of a pass.
-5 card spades on the side is way too much for me to open 3♣.
-1♣ opening is not even a lead director.
-My hand perfectly fits in the definition of a pass.
Really? I have an agreement with partner that a 3rd seat 1♣ opener that is revealed to be weak later in the auction is most often a strong lead indicator, otherwise why bother. You haven't impeded their bidding and with marginal standard openings and poor clubs we can choose a decent 4-card major. Works out most of the time.
I can't stand to pass at these colors or to miss spades at mp's so 1♣ for me.
When a deaf person goes to court is it still called a hearing?
What is baby oil made of?
What is baby oil made of?
#17
- Experimental biddicist
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,909
- Joined: 2010-January-02
- Gender:Male
Posted 2015-August-04, 11:23
eagles123, on 2015-August-04, 08:39, said:
looks like you're going to have to change your vote to 5c now, Jinksy
I might make an exception to my 'bid one more than everyone else' rule for an aggressive Bermuda Bowl finalist
The "4♥ is a transfer to 4♠" award goes to Jinksy - PhilKing
#18
- Group: Full Members
- Posts: 122
- Joined: 2015-March-13
Posted 2015-August-04, 12:45
When it comes to 3rd seat preempts, the only rule is 'there are no rules.'. You can pretty much do whatever you want, so a theoretically questionable bid becomes desirable if you think it rates to grant a tactical advantage.
The example hand is certainly an odd one. In all honesty I think I would try 4♣ (IMPs or matchpoints). Counting losers this is 'ballpark'. I'll have another guess to make if the opponents get to 4♥ (how they get there affects my choice) but for now I'll try to buy (read: 'steal') it.
The example hand is certainly an odd one. In all honesty I think I would try 4♣ (IMPs or matchpoints). Counting losers this is 'ballpark'. I'll have another guess to make if the opponents get to 4♥ (how they get there affects my choice) but for now I'll try to buy (read: 'steal') it.
Page 1 of 1