As you can see slam is pretty good, but I think it can't be found with simple natural methods (taking suggestions though). Can you find it with your favorite system?
Tough slam to find
#1
Posted 2016-January-22, 16:58
As you can see slam is pretty good, but I think it can't be found with simple natural methods (taking suggestions though). Can you find it with your favorite system?
-- Bertrand Russell
#2
Posted 2016-January-22, 17:48
-P.J. Painter.
#3
Posted 2016-January-22, 17:51
-- Bertrand Russell
#4
Posted 2016-January-22, 17:55
1♣-1♦
1♠-2♦
3♠-4♦
6♠
1♣ = 16+
1♦ = 0-7
1♠ = 4+ spades unbalanced, may have longer minor, forcing.
2♦ = 5-7, exactly 3 spades.
3♠ = Agrees spades, forcing to game.
4♦ = Qbid.
6♠ = Slam has to be good, grand not possible barring miracles.
#5
Posted 2016-January-22, 18:43
mgoetze, on 2016-January-22, 17:51, said:
2C-2D
2S-4D
Responder doesn't have a singleton.
-P.J. Painter.
#6
Posted 2016-January-22, 19:09
West might try 5d over 4s but tough, not easy but I feel west has just enough extras to justify 5d....tougher at the table. granted I make the assumption that 4d was NOT shortness and 2d promised a random ace or king and 3s promised something more..a lot of assumptions
#7
Posted 2016-January-22, 19:38
2♣ (3)....2♦ (4)
2♥ (3)...3♣ (5)
3♦ (3)...3♥ (6)
3♠ (7)....4♣ (8)
4♦ (9)...4♠ (10)
6♠
1: 16+ any
2: Balanced without 4♠ OR 5+♦
3: Relay
4: Balanced hand
5: 4-4 minors
6: 3=2=4=4
7: QP ask (A=3, K=2, Q=1)
8: 3 QPs; at this point we know holding must be KQ♥ / KQ♣ or A♦
9: Parity Scan
10: Odd ♦ honour parity; A♦ and nothing else per force
Note that we could have found out the J♦ before reaching 6♠ as well, but shooting for 7 seems rather excessive on this hand.
#8
Posted 2016-January-22, 20:10
2N-3♣ (Rule of 31+, either 5S4H, 6+S4+H, or 1-suited w/ 6+ S // relay)
3♦-3♥ (1-suited // relay, usually 2+ S)
3♠-3N (short C or 6(32)2 // relay)
4♣-4♦ (6(32)2 // relay)
4♠-4N (6322 // RKC(S))
5♣-5♦ (1 or 4 key cards // SQ ask)
5♠-5N (SQ, no HK // CK ask (now hoping for AKQxxx-Axx-KQ-AK))
6♣-6♠ (no CK // to play)
P
Not particularly elegant, but it helps to know that Opener has 6+ S and that he could not have a weaker hand, point-wise, for his bidding up to and including 4♠.
(I've stolen the '(--- // ---)' notation from Fluffy.)
#9
Posted 2016-January-23, 11:22
east might well have another go on general hand quality, but that depends how traditional you are with your 2c openers. i believe in 2c showing good play for game opposite xxx xxx xxx xxx and a useless 13th card (the west hand qualifies but only by a small margin - 9 tricks for 3nt).
#10
Posted 2016-January-23, 13:55
responder bids the appropriate suit. This hand would be bid as follows (after 3s):
3N I have all side suits controlled do you have any 1+or 2 top 3 honor side suits with 4+ cards?
4d I have 4+ dia with at least 1 of the top 3 honors (we have bypassed clubs since no honors)
4h suit quality?
5h 2 of top 3 with JT
5n how many diamonds
6c 4 note that opener can not now bid 6d as that is to play
6h A form of last train asking if responder has an unshown side K to bid 7, there will not always be room to make this bid but it must be used if 6n seems a sure thing. Failure to use it (when available) means 6n is something of a gamble.
6s I have nothing special
6n
pass when last train was not available opener should only bid 6n (vs a suit contract) when they feel it will be cold for 12 tricks responder can still bid 7 if they have an undisclosed side K.
*note that in all cases opener steps must not rebid their agreed trump suit (this is construed as a sign off) while responder should be ok with it (unless they want to take control)
responder steps are as follows and remember responder has already promised at least 1 of top 3 honors and opener has at least 1 (controls in all side suits)
1st = no extra
next step by opener asks about JT
neither
T no J
J no T
JT
2nd = 2 of top 3 No J or T
3rd = 2 of top 3 T no J
4th = 2 of top 3 J no T
5th = JT
#11
Posted 2016-January-25, 07:10
Finally, to nullve, I would suggest you not use 3NT as a relay, particularly in an auction with no guaranteed fit. It is also easy to rearrange a couple of cards to give a similar auction to a hopeless slam so I am not convinced this is an improvement over natural. I suspect the Moscito and IMPrecision auctions would be a lot better here (my system's auction is similar to natural except that Responder's strength is slightly more accurately known).
#12
Posted 2016-January-25, 08:17
Zelandakh, on 2016-January-25, 07:10, said:
Yes. So 3♥ guarantees a fit unless Responder is strong enough to deal with the consequences of not having one.
Quote
I also think that a regular partnership playing standard should be able be able to bid the slam with some confidence.
Quote
My system is less ambitious than these on slam deals.
#13
Posted 2016-January-26, 11:01
kenrexford, on 2016-January-22, 18:43, said:
2S-4D
Responder doesn't have a singleton.
What does responder do over 2♠ with eg xxx KQxxx x Kxxx?
#14
Posted 2016-January-26, 11:41
Jinksy, on 2016-January-26, 11:01, said:
If you don't splinter, and then bid 4♦ over 4♣, and then hear 4♥ from partner, you don't bid 4♠ to play.
-P.J. Painter.