BBO Discussion Forums: A Different Defence - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

A Different Defence

#1 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-March-11, 05:57


IMPs Lead 3

Dummy plays the ace of clubs, declarer following with the queen (but you lead high from a doubleton) and then leads the queen of spades. Plan the defence.

And, interestingly, Deep Finesse produces an error when I enter the four hands into it! But I think I have worked out best defence!

https://app.pianola....40/Travellers/7 gives the board.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#2 User is offline   rhm 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,092
  • Joined: 2005-June-27

Posted 2017-March-11, 07:00

My deep finesse Version 2.0 does not produce an error.
At least I do not see it
Where do you see an error?

Rainer Herrmann
0

#3 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-March-11, 07:52

View Postrhm, on 2017-March-11, 07:00, said:

My deep finesse Version 2.0 does not produce an error.
At least I do not see it
Where do you see an error?

Rainer Herrmann

https://www.dropbox.....49.10.png?dl=0

It gave an error message:
Deep Finesse Alert
New cache cell: Existing cache cell: Unexpected Error: INTERNAL ERROR: inconsistent prc won results. If I swap the 8 and 7 of hearts it is fine! and it is version 2.0 too.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

#4 User is offline   gszes 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,660
  • Joined: 2011-February-12

Posted 2017-March-14, 06:50

I am somewhat skeptical we can beat this but it seems logical to duck the first spade (I will regret this in the am if lho manages to have 6 spades though).
0

#5 User is offline   lamford 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,446
  • Joined: 2007-October-15

Posted 2017-March-28, 06:12

View Postgszes, on 2017-March-14, 06:50, said:

I am somewhat skeptical we can beat this but it seems logical to duck the first spade (I will regret this in the am if lho manages to have 6 spades though).

Indeed ducking the first spade leaves declarer with no recourse. Declarer has KT87x 98xx Kx Qx and there is, oddly, no way home when you do that! My partner did not find it either.
I prefer to give the lawmakers credit for stating things for a reason - barmar
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users