Enough for a takeout double?
#3
Posted 2005-June-05, 18:58
WinstonM
#4
Posted 2005-June-05, 18:58
#5 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-05, 19:13
#6
Posted 2005-June-05, 19:20
Jlall, on Jun 5 2005, 08:13 PM, said:
TOOO tough
Wow, bidding this 18 hcp game is great, I need to x and p needs to jump to 4H. Wow.
You could even add HCP to Justin's example hand and I still missed game.
#7 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-05, 19:24

#8
Posted 2005-June-05, 19:37
double is OK in 13-16 NT system because P will either have 5+ clubs, 4441, or extra values.
just another example of why I dislike strong NTs
#9
Posted 2005-June-05, 19:49
WinstonM
#10 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2005-June-05, 20:19
#11
Posted 2005-June-06, 00:27
#13
Posted 2005-June-06, 05:18
Ben
#14
Posted 2005-June-06, 05:26
♠A983
♥Q1062
♦52
♣J64
The one I have now is much better; the singleton diamond makes all the difference. I obviously know that double can be wrong, but I think I must risk it. Again I would not have faced the same problem if I had played a weak NT. Then I would have known that partner can't have a balanced 12-14 hand.
He can now, and no fit is guaranteed. Oh well, life is tough.
Roland
#15
Posted 2005-June-06, 05:57
Agree with the other doublers. In general if RHO preempts and you are short in the suit, you should stretch to find a bid, because partner won't be able to find one.
Conversely if you are long in their suit you should not bend over backwards to bid. Partner is still there.
#17
Posted 2005-June-06, 07:31
#18
Posted 2005-June-06, 07:42
As others already said, I need to help partner (even streching a little bit) who probably won't be able to balance being long in opps suit.
Alain
#19
Posted 2005-June-06, 07:57
#20
Posted 2005-June-06, 08:45
N - E - S - W
1♣ -3♦ -???