Help
What are your thoughts
If you ask for features you will get a club feature
MPs
Page 1 of 1
- You cannot start a new topic
Add Reply
What about this hand
MultiQuote
#3
- hooked
-
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 10,766
- Joined: 2003-November-15
- Gender:Female
- Location:Vancouver, Canada
- Interests:Multi
Posted 2025-March-11, 19:48
4♥. I briefly wanted to be a hand hog and bid 3nt, but if I do, I am not getting to dummy to run the suit.
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly." MikeH
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
“Let me put it in words you might understand,” he said. “Mr. Trump, f–k off!” Anders Vistisen
#4
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,437
- Joined: 2021-February-13
- Gender:Not Telling
- Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
Posted 2025-March-11, 20:15
2N looking to resolve partners strength and shape if max. You could be slamming in 6N.
xx, AQxxxx, xx, Axx & loving a lead to one of the pointed suits.
xx, AQxxxx, xx, Axx & loving a lead to one of the pointed suits.
#5
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 17,106
- Joined: 2003-October-07
- Gender:Male
Posted 2025-March-11, 20:47
#6
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 2,704
- Joined: 2018-July-04
- Gender:Male
- Location:Australia
Posted 2025-March-11, 23:26
mike777, on 2025-March-11, 20:47, said:
An opening hand
My regular partner has a tendency to over sound pre-empts, especially getting a positive feature in clubs
I made 3NT+3 but a few gambled on one of two (edit correction 4) possible slams (one a grand)
I did consider trying for slam myself
EDIT 2 4 hearts is fine but 3NT slightly better
#8
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 14,437
- Joined: 2009-July-13
- Location:England
Posted Yesterday, 04:18
On the actual hand 6♦ looks to need little more than a 3-2 diamond break, but is very difficult to get to.
We have the agreement that in first and third we don't open a weak 2 (multi actually) with 2 aces, so the choice is P or 1♥ and it's close.
We have the agreement that in first and third we don't open a weak 2 (multi actually) with 2 aces, so the choice is P or 1♥ and it's close.
#9
- Group: Advanced Members
- Posts: 1,437
- Joined: 2021-February-13
- Gender:Not Telling
- Interests:Bidding & play optimisation via simulation.
Posted Yesterday, 04:30
Cyberyeti, on 2025-March-12, 04:18, said:
On the actual hand 6♦ looks to need little more than a 3-2 diamond break, but is very difficult to get to.
We have the agreement that in first and third we don't open a weak 2 (multi actually) with 2 aces, so the choice is P or 1♥ and it's close.
We have the agreement that in first and third we don't open a weak 2 (multi actually) with 2 aces, so the choice is P or 1♥ and it's close.
Depends on your 2N sequence.
With one partner I play
3♣ 6♥(331), 26(32) max.
.. 3♦ <Shortage?>
.... 3N 1633
Page 1 of 1
- You cannot start a new topic
- Add Reply