BBO Discussion Forums: What should i bid? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

What should i bid?

#21 User is online   DavidKok 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,793
  • Joined: 2020-March-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2025-April-24, 09:14

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-April-24, 08:29, said:

I'm interested how much people think 1-1-X-3-3 shows both in terms of points and shape?
This is a classic auction for double Weasel. Just make sure to pause longer than mandatory if you wish to make a slow bid. Instead of 3, we have the options:
  • Fast double is takeout, showing both minors (alternatively you can interpret this as a thrump double).
  • Slow double is a game try double, showing approximately 15-17 points in playing strength and 4-card spade support.
  • Fast 3 is a maximum for a hand not worth a game try double, approximately 13-15 points.
  • Slow 3 is a minimum opening wishing to compete to 3. Obviously, partner has UI issues after this option (unless they have a genuine GF), so we put the weak hand here.
Stronger hands have to bid at the 4-level.

Being serious though: in competition we don't have enough bids to show all hands. I'm with Robson & Segal: hand type first. This also means 'strength later'. 3 is wide-ranging, and so is 4. If you play game try doubles here you can reduce the ranges a little bit - the direct 3 then shows approximately 11-14, X shows 14-16 and 4 shows 17+ (overlap intentional). Without them you just have to take your lumps: unbalanced hands weaker than a GF bid 3, stronger hands choose between 4 and 4. And before we praise game try doubles too much: if you are instead dealt, say, a 3=1=4=5 or 2=2=4=5 or 2=1=4=6 17-count you'll wish you did not play them here.
To me 3 shows an unbalanced hand. Thanks to the SNT I can either pass with the WNT or bid game with the stronger range. This helps partner make competitive decisions should they bid 4. Hopefully partner can keep the auction open if we have a WNT with 4-card support and competing further is good.
0

#22 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,519
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-April-24, 10:48

View PostDavidKok, on 2025-April-24, 09:14, said:

To me 3 shows an unbalanced hand. Thanks to the SNT I can either pass with the WNT or bid game with the stronger range. This helps partner make competitive decisions should they bid 4. Hopefully partner can keep the auction open if we have a WNT with 4-card support and competing further is good.


This is what I was getting at, never having played strong NT short club, I wasn't sure whether you were supposed to bid 3 with say AKxx, xx, xxx, AJxx
0

#23 User is online   DavidKok 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,793
  • Joined: 2020-March-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted 2025-April-24, 10:59

With that hand I think a lot of people would, but I'm not sure it is good to do so. The hand is so pure that even if we end up bidding 1-over-the-law we'll likely be fine. However, partner may raise us to game too aggressively.
By contrast, something like JTxx, Qxx, Ax, AKxx is a clear pass for me (assuming 1NT is 15-17), as is Qxxx, Ax, KQxx, Qxx (which I open 1).
0

#24 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,160
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-April-24, 11:06

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-April-24, 10:48, said:

This is what I was getting at, never having played strong NT short club, I wasn't sure whether you were supposed to bid 3 with say AKxx, xx, xxx, AJxx


With that one I would ask do you want partner to bid 4s over your 3s bid with whatever your partnership would consider an invitational hand?
0

#25 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,519
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2025-April-24, 12:41

View Postmike777, on 2025-April-24, 11:06, said:

With that one I would ask do you want partner to bid 4s over your 3s bid with whatever your partnership would consider an invitational hand?


Depends if 3 is merely competitive and X is game try
0

#26 User is offline   mike777 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,160
  • Joined: 2003-October-07
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2025-April-24, 13:04

View PostCyberyeti, on 2025-April-24, 12:41, said:

Depends if 3 is merely competitive and X is game try



You tell us, it is your specific hand example.

his is what I was getting at, never having played strong NT short club, I wasn't sure whether you were supposed to bid 3♠ with say AKxx, xx, xxx, AJxx

With that one I would ask do you want partner to bid 4s over your 3s bid with whatever your partnership would consider an invitational hand?
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users