BBO Discussion Forums: Card holder for hand or sight impaired bridge players - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Card holder for hand or sight impaired bridge players

#1 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,636
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted Yesterday, 16:10

For the second time in two years I was thrown up against the same pair: an elderly player and her charming grand-daughter, who explained that grandmother had severe sight problems and needed to use a card holder plus a strong back light to see her cards. Which should be fine (no question that at lower levels of competition, inclusion has priority over perfection of the competitive result). But her card holder (yet again) has not one, but four rows, and she insistently and very visibily starts to sort her hand into four rows.
I call the TD who explains the potential problem and asks her gently to place her cards in one row, she does so but as soon as he is gone starts to reorder them in four rows.
I gave up because my partner (with short memory) seemed to think they must be in good faith (or it was too embarassing to demand that the Laws be enforced).

Your thoughts?

As I pointed out to them later, there are elegant single-row curved card holders of 33cm (but there was no problem in holding 13 cards in one row of her holder anyway, as she reluctantly demonstrated when the TD insisted. She could also place the affair on her knees below table level if necessary).
0

#2 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,300
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Yesterday, 18:30

If this was a club game, I'd let it go but you did mention TD
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
0

#3 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,636
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted Today, 15:10

View Postjillybean, on 2025-July-20, 18:30, said:

If this was a club game, I'd let it go but you did mention TD


It was a national simultaneous tournament, an inter-club game with in this case 20 tables.
So (fortunately) nothing more than prestige and masterpoints at stake, but not appropriate for a circus act like this either.

If I was the TD, I would instruct them to place the cards in one line and politely suggest that in future they add a screen in front of the card holder or use a tray below table height instead.
0

#4 User is online   pilowsky 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,851
  • Joined: 2019-October-04
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Poland

Posted Today, 18:18

Parkinson's law - The less there is at stake, the more people care.
Fortuna Fortis Felix
0

#5 User is online   mycroft 

  • Secretary Bird
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,948
  • Joined: 2003-July-12
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Calgary, D18; Chapala, D16

Posted Today, 18:21

I think a simple card, A5 or so size, taped to the back of the card holder will assist. I have seen several similar used by people who don't want the opponents clocking their plays.

I would have suggested the traditional DM's screen, but the others do need to see the die rolls bids and plays.

There is, of course, the option you claimed you (would) take the last time - play with double dummy distribution knowledge yourself, and do it better than the daughter.
Long live the Republic-k. -- Major General J. Golding Frederick (tSCoSI)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2 User(s) are reading this topic
1 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users

  1. HardVector,
  2. Google