Playing Acol, 3 weak twos, weak NT with a scratch partner. What now?
Page 1 of 1
Beast from the east (3)
#4
Posted Yesterday, 18:12
..
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#5
Posted Yesterday, 18:12
This is the draw back of the weak nt
Pass
Pass
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#6
Posted Yesterday, 18:36
jillybean, on 2025-December-03, 18:12, said:
This is the draw back of the weak nt
Pass
Pass
In Acol is partner allowed to bid 2c or 1D with 6-7 or so and some cards, rather than 1nT, after an one club opening?
Don't you want to avoid no trump from partners side with 6 pts playing acol after a one club opening?
#7
Posted Yesterday, 20:44
I don't know about Acol
But with a un passed hand, 2C would be gf
1C 1D is traditionally 8-10 nf
Yes, ideally we want the opening bidder playing 1nt. Yesh, we need transfers!
But with a un passed hand, 2C would be gf
1C 1D is traditionally 8-10 nf
Yes, ideally we want the opening bidder playing 1nt. Yesh, we need transfers!
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
#8
Posted Today, 01:43
Hi,
x
If p cannot stand it, he can always bid 3C or 3D.
I would do this at both MP and IMPs, it is more
interesting playing IMPs.
with kind regards
Marlowe
x
If p cannot stand it, he can always bid 3C or 3D.
I would do this at both MP and IMPs, it is more
interesting playing IMPs.
with kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#9
Posted Today, 01:47
mike777, on 2025-December-03, 18:36, said:
In Acol is partner allowed to bid 2c or 1D with 6-7 or so and some cards, rather than 1nT, after an one club opening?
Don't you want to avoid no trump from partners side with 6 pts playing acol after a one club opening?
Don't you want to avoid no trump from partners side with 6 pts playing acol after a one club opening?
Traditionally i seem to remember, that 1NT promised values, but i dont believer it ever became
mainstream.
I also dont think, that bidding 1D with only 3 small cards and 6/7 was ever mainstream.
So you either bid 1NT or 2C, the later is only an option, if you dont play inv. minors.
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#10
Posted Today, 01:51
Not familiar with Acol but the bidding is not over yet. Partner knows from my non-opening of 1NT that I have either real clubs or a strong hand. Do I need to re emphasize it?
They have a minor oriented hand (sometimes 3343 and we have no fit) so can always balance with 3C if they have more than a dead min and want to compete. What would 2NT mean? Upper limit to play facing a strong NT or to correct to 3C otherwise, or a 5D/3C hand fighting for the partscore, no mt willing to impose C as D might play better facing a strong NT? Would partner skip a 5-cd D suit with a notrumpy hand?
They have a minor oriented hand (sometimes 3343 and we have no fit) so can always balance with 3C if they have more than a dead min and want to compete. What would 2NT mean? Upper limit to play facing a strong NT or to correct to 3C otherwise, or a 5D/3C hand fighting for the partscore, no mt willing to impose C as D might play better facing a strong NT? Would partner skip a 5-cd D suit with a notrumpy hand?
#13
Posted Today, 03:51
Does 1NT show 3=3=3=4, or are other distributions also possible? If partner would bid a four card suit at the 1-level ahead of 1NT (especially good to get out of the way for the strong NT!), and would raise 1♣ with 5 (especially attractive as 1♣ shows 4+), this is the only remaining shape. Back when I played a weak (12-14) NT in a natural system we even allowed 1♣-1♦ on a 3-card suit to get ahead of this problem. If so we might not be able to pass and wait for partner to keep it open, as partner doesn't have a clear takeout double with three spades under the overcall and a pancake hand.
I would like double to be takeout. I think a few decades ago people reserved the double for the strong NT, but I don't think that style is very playable. What are your agreements here?
It's a little bit surprising that the opponents wandered into a 6-card spade fit rather than their 8-card heart fit, especially vulnerable. I am not sure whether 3NT will make - the odds are slightly against it - and defending 2♠ (even undoubled) might score better than bidding 3♣. It would be better to defend 2♠X though, I think.
I would like double to be takeout. I think a few decades ago people reserved the double for the strong NT, but I don't think that style is very playable. What are your agreements here?
It's a little bit surprising that the opponents wandered into a 6-card spade fit rather than their 8-card heart fit, especially vulnerable. I am not sure whether 3NT will make - the odds are slightly against it - and defending 2♠ (even undoubled) might score better than bidding 3♣. It would be better to defend 2♠X though, I think.
Page 1 of 1

Help
