opening call
#2
Posted 2007-May-31, 12:42
#3
Posted 2007-May-31, 12:54
#4 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-May-31, 13:05
edit: ok just read the poll, 2S is a minimum opening bid with spades? I'm not sure how to play that convention or whether this qualifies or not, but I'd probably still pass. Again, I think it's just too flawed for a preempt (in this case multi).
#6
Posted 2007-May-31, 16:47
#7
Posted 2007-May-31, 19:39
Once you accept making the call with a bad suit, but compensating shape, you always will. I remember Justin discussing how he opens in 3rd seat on just about anything because it works.
I have a similar experience with weak 2's like this, and I look forward to the opportunity to make the call, especially when I think the other table(s) won't.
#9
Posted 2007-June-06, 01:50
#10
Posted 2007-June-06, 02:09
a bid to show the 2-suiter, I usually pass.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#11
Posted 2007-June-06, 05:22
I have had occasional partners criticise bids like this, but I think too rigid a view of preempts limits their frequency and effect.
#13
Posted 2007-June-06, 07:30
George Carlin
#14
Posted 2007-June-06, 08:30
#15 Guest_Jlall_*
Posted 2007-June-06, 12:57
Apollo81, on Jun 6 2007, 08:11 AM, said:
lol, when i saw 1 vote for 3S I was like "woolsey or stewart must be on this panel."
#16
Posted 2007-June-06, 13:02
Jlall, on Jun 6 2007, 01:57 PM, said:
Apollo81, on Jun 6 2007, 08:11 AM, said:
lol, when i saw 1 vote for 3S I was like "woolsey or stewart must be on this panel."
Did you see the Roman 'I would open 4♠ at another vul' comment hehe.

Help
