BBO Discussion Forums: how to beat this 5C? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

how to beat this 5C?

#1 User is offline   pine cone 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 2006-August-15

Posted 2008-July-02, 10:38

Scoring: IMP


the bidding went like this:
W  N E S
 -- /  /  1D
2C / 3C X
/  3S /  /
4C   /  / 4D
5C /   / x
//

first round: north lead D5, east D4,south DJ, west D6
now, what should south do?
0

#2 User is offline   bill1157 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 311
  • Joined: 2007-December-11

Posted 2008-July-02, 15:41

jack of hearts

Bill
0

#3 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-July-02, 16:09

Seven of spades.

My concern is getting caught in a heart-diamond squeeze.

If Declarer has AQxx in hearts, for instance, he might be able to pull trumps and end in dummy with the diamond King and a heart, where I have to save the diamond Ace and a heart, but then if Declarer has Ax left, I am screwed.

If Declarer can win, say, six clubs, two hearts, and two spades, that's 10 tricks. Now he needs that squeeze.

OK, how about xx AQ32 x AKQxxx?

If I win the diamond and return a heart, he ducks. On the second heart, he wins the Queen. He runs six clubs and then hooks the spade. His last two cards on dummy will be the diamond King and a heart, and I'm squeezed.

There seems to be a solution, though. I return a spade at trick two. If Declarer later ducks a heart to rectify hearts, a second spade traps him in dummy. If Declarer wins the spade and finesses a heart to return, he can then duck a heart, but I win this and return another heart to sever communications there. So, he trumps a diamond back. But, then when he ducks the heart we kill the diamond King.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#4 User is offline   Trumpace 

  • Hideous Rabbit
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,040
  • Joined: 2005-January-22
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-July-02, 16:19

What kind of leads do N/S play?

Would N lead the 5 from 985?
0

#5 User is offline   Trumpace 

  • Hideous Rabbit
  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,040
  • Joined: 2005-January-22
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2008-July-02, 16:43

kenrexford, on Jul 2 2008, 05:09 PM, said:

There seems to be a solution, though.  I return a spade at trick two.  If Declarer later ducks a heart to rectify hearts, a second spade traps him in dummy.  If Declarer wins the spade and finesses a heart to return, he can then duck a heart, but I win this and return another heart to sever communications there.  So, he trumps a diamond back.  But, then when he ducks the heart we kill the diamond King.

And if declarer ducks the spade, pd will have to return a spade. So is 7 right? (I guess so, since he probably knows we likely have 3, but the bidding seems very strange to me).

Weird, all my posts in this thread have been about leads.. :P
0

#6 User is offline   pine cone 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 2006-August-15

Posted 2008-July-02, 19:11

The lead of North shows his D is 5 or 985.

This hand was played on bbo last night. I was north and my D was actually single.
I think there is little chance to beat 5C except D ruff. And I also think my p's 4D bid is not good.

Does anybody agree with me?
0

#7 User is offline   TylerE 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,770
  • Joined: 2006-January-30

Posted 2008-July-02, 19:42

On the auction it sounds to me like W is short in D, not N.
0

#8 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-July-02, 20:24

pine cone, on Jul 2 2008, 08:11 PM, said:

The lead of North shows his D is 5 or 985.

This hand was played on bbo last night. I was north and my D was actually single.
I think there is little chance to beat 5C except D ruff. And I also think my p's 4D bid is not good.

Does anybody agree with me?

If a diamond return is necessary to beat 5, you seem to need West to have Kx AQ xxx AKQxxx.

A spade return, however, beats 5 if West has Jx AQxx x AKQxxx.

For the former to be, partner must have Jxxxx xxxx x xxx.

For the latter, partner must have K10xxx xx xxx xxx.

Everything is plausible, except that the spade lead caters to Declarer having about four losers with good cause to believe that his values and shortness are well-placed and that length will find shortness. The diamond return caters to Declarer having about a half extra loser but an expectation that partner may well have short diamond values, but his heart honors are tight.

Seems too close to call, but the edge to me seems to be to the spade return. That hardly classifies as a conclusion that there is little chance to beat 5 except with a diamond return. I think there is on average a better chance to beat 5 with a spade return, personally.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

#9 User is offline   nige1 

  • 5-level belongs to me
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,128
  • Joined: 2004-August-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Glasgow Scotland
  • Interests:Poems Computers

Posted 2008-July-02, 22:37

kenrexford, on Jul 2 2008, 05:09 PM, said:

OK, how about xx AQ32 x AKQxxx?

If I win the diamond and return a heart, he ducks.  On the second heart, he wins the Queen.  He runs six clubs and then hooks the spade.  His last two cards on dummy will be the diamond King and a heart, and I'm squeezed.

There seems to be a solution, though.  I return a spade at trick two.  If Declarer later ducks a heart to rectify hearts, a second spade traps him in dummy.  If Declarer wins the spade and finesses a heart to return, he can then duck a heart, but I win this and return another heart to sever communications there.  So, he trumps a diamond back.  But, then when he ducks the heart we kill the diamond King.

On Ken's construction, whatever the defence, it seems that declarer can draw 3 rounds of trumps, making 2, 2, 6, and 1 ruff -- losing only 1 and 1 :P
0

#10 User is offline   FrancesHinden 

  • Limit bidder
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 8,482
  • Joined: 2004-November-02
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:England
  • Interests:Bridge, classical music, skiing... but I spend more time earning a living than doing any of those

Posted 2008-July-03, 01:25

kenrexford, on Jul 2 2008, 11:09 PM, said:

Seven of spades.

My concern is getting caught in a heart-diamond squeeze.

<snip long analysis>

This is all way too complicated.

Most of the time partner had three diamonds he would have bid 3D over the double, not 3S. So it's hugely likely that partner has a singleton diamond, and I would just give him his diamond ruff.

p.s. our bidding is insane. Where did the double of 5C come from? And where did the double of 3C come from (admittedly a little less insane than doubling 5C)
p.p.s their bidding is insane. If East was going to bid over 3S, either x or 3NT seem eminently sound calls. How much were you going to enjoy playing 3Sx?
0

#11 User is offline   pine cone 

  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 7
  • Joined: 2006-August-15

Posted 2008-July-03, 04:05

Scoring: IMP

This is the west hand.
0

#12 User is offline   kenrexford 

  • Brain Farts and Actual Farts Increasing with Age
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,586
  • Joined: 2005-September-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Lima, Allen County, North-West-Central Ohio, USA
  • Interests:www.limadbc.blogspot.com editor/contributor

Posted 2008-July-03, 06:23

nige1, on Jul 2 2008, 11:37 PM, said:

kenrexford, on Jul 2 2008, 05:09 PM, said:

OK, how about xx AQ32 x AKQxxx?

If I win the diamond and return a heart, he ducks.  On the second heart, he wins the Queen.  He runs six clubs and then hooks the spade.  His last two cards on dummy will be the diamond King and a heart, and I'm squeezed.

There seems to be a solution, though.  I return a spade at trick two.  If Declarer later ducks a heart to rectify hearts, a second spade traps him in dummy.  If Declarer wins the spade and finesses a heart to return, he can then duck a heart, but I win this and return another heart to sever communications there.  So, he trumps a diamond back.  But, then when he ducks the heart we kill the diamond King.

On Ken's construction, whatever the defence, it seems that declarer can draw 3 rounds of trumps, making 2, 2, 6, and 1 ruff -- losing only 1 and 1 :)

Oh yeah. Duh!

OK -- so my line is the only one to beat 5NT. :huh:
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."

-P.J. Painter.
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users