BBO Discussion Forums: now, later or never? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

now, later or never?

Poll: your bid (22 member(s) have cast votes)

your bid

  1. pass and accept partner's double (13 votes [59.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 59.09%

  2. pass and bid 3[DI] after partner's double (3 votes [13.64%])

    Percentage of vote: 13.64%

  3. 3[DI] (5 votes [22.73%])

    Percentage of vote: 22.73%

  4. something else (1 votes [4.55%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.55%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-March-01, 19:42

MPs, nobody vul

A6532
-
A754
QJ107

S - W - N - E
1-X-XX-ps
ps-2-ps-ps
X-ps-ps-2
???
0

#2 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,602
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted 2009-March-01, 20:49

What does partners XX show ?
“It is not because things are difficult that we do not dare, it is because we do not dare that they are difficult.”
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
0

#3 User is offline   orlam 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 152
  • Joined: 2009-January-10

Posted 2009-March-01, 20:52

How about doubling so that declarer doesn't know the trump split right away?
Trying to learn, I have many questions.
0

#4 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-March-02, 04:23

jillybean2, on Mar 2 2009, 02:49 AM, said:

What does partners XX show ?

actually it showed 10+, no support, and 4+ cards in 2 suits, (hearts and diamonds after the pass of 2). But interested on what would it mean on your standard context.
0

#5 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,043
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-March-02, 04:33

3D.

I am not going to play 2HX

Since Pass is forcing, passing now and subseq. bidding 3D
showes add. values, which I dont have.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#6 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-March-02, 05:05

Pass and pass pard's dbl. Why can't he have 5 hearts or 4 good ones?
0

#7 User is offline   skjaeran 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,727
  • Joined: 2006-June-05
  • Location:Oslo, Norway
  • Interests:Bridge, sports, Sci-fi, fantasy

Posted 2009-March-02, 13:54

Pass and pass partners double. If I wasn't passing 2x now I'd have bid 2 over the redouble. I guess I'd have bid 2 the previous round at the table.
Kind regards,
Harald
0

#8 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-March-02, 18:20

I'd have bid 2 on the second round. It's hardly a surprise that passing led to a bidding problem.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#9 User is offline   flytoox 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,606
  • Joined: 2003-June-06

Posted 2009-March-02, 22:16

Pass and pass pd's dbl. This procedure looks so much likely that pd have a stack of hearts.
0

#10 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2009-March-04, 17:18

Partner had 1552 with Q1097x in hearts, 2 was normally 500, wich is better than your game. 6 was making becuase split 2-2 but we didn't find it anyway.
0

#11 User is online   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,817
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted 2009-March-05, 09:26

gnasher, on Mar 2 2009, 07:20 PM, said:

I'd have bid 2 on the second round. It's hardly a surprise that passing led to a bidding problem.

agreed.

We should be looking ahead when partner redoubles... passing was lazy, and suggested interest in defending. We are morally certain that we don't want to defend 2. So why create a problem... bid 2 to announce a minimum unbalanced hand. Then we could trust partner's decisions
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
0

#12 User is offline   dicklont 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 750
  • Joined: 2007-October-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands
  • Interests:Bridge, music, sports

Posted 2009-March-05, 10:17

I am not interested in defending with this hand and that´s why I should have bid before.
In fact I don't like low-level doubles, most of the time you're better of declaring.

Now I won´t run when partner doubles 2.
Although my hand is not strong, it has two aces.
All is not lost, maybe defending gives an ok result.
--
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users