now, later or never?
#1
Posted 2009-March-01, 19:42
♠A6532
♥-
♦A754
♣QJ107
S - W - N - E
1♠-X-XX-ps
ps-2♣-ps-ps
X-ps-ps-2♥
???
#2
Posted 2009-March-01, 20:49
"You need to play a lot of stuff these days just to deal with the stuff your opponents are playing" DBurn
#3
Posted 2009-March-01, 20:52
#4
Posted 2009-March-02, 04:23
jillybean2, on Mar 2 2009, 02:49 AM, said:
actually it showed 10+, no support, and 4+ cards in 2 suits, (hearts and diamonds after the pass of 2♣). But interested on what would it mean on your standard context.
#5
Posted 2009-March-02, 04:33
I am not going to play 2HX
Since Pass is forcing, passing now and subseq. bidding 3D
showes add. values, which I dont have.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#7
Posted 2009-March-02, 13:54
Harald
#8
Posted 2009-March-02, 18:20
#9
Posted 2009-March-02, 22:16
#10
Posted 2009-March-04, 17:18
#11
Posted 2009-March-05, 09:26
gnasher, on Mar 2 2009, 07:20 PM, said:
agreed.
We should be looking ahead when partner redoubles... passing was lazy, and suggested interest in defending. We are morally certain that we don't want to defend 2♥. So why create a problem... bid 2♣ to announce a minimum unbalanced hand. Then we could trust partner's decisions
#12
Posted 2009-March-05, 10:17
In fact I don't like low-level doubles, most of the time you're better of declaring.
Now I won´t run when partner doubles 2♥.
Although my hand is not strong, it has two aces.
All is not lost, maybe defending gives an ok result.
Finding your own mistakes is more productive than looking for partner's. It improves your game and is good for your soul. (Nige1)

Help
