BBO Discussion Forums: 2d VS 3d - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

2d VS 3d

#1 User is offline   subvert 

  • PipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 14
  • Joined: 2009-May-28

Posted 2009-November-16, 03:02

Scoring: IMP

west open 1H,and pd db, east pass,it is your turn(south),2d or 3d?
0

#2 User is offline   Jlall 

  • Follower of 655321
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 3,293
  • Joined: 2008-December-05
  • Interests:drinking, women, bridge...what else?

Posted 2009-November-16, 03:03

3!D
0

#3 User is offline   effervesce 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 885
  • Joined: 2007-March-28

Posted 2009-November-16, 03:04

3♦. The hand looks very nice with values in the long suits and no wasted values opposite partner's presumed heart shortage.
Ming

--Always remember you're unique. Just like everyone else.
0

#4 User is offline   P_Marlowe 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,847
  • Joined: 2005-March-18
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2009-November-16, 04:49

3D.

The reason is simple, 2D showes nothing, not even a 5 card suit.

With kind regards
Marlowe
With kind regards
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
0

#5 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-November-16, 07:25

3 seems like a no-brainer. If pard has a 4144 (even if min) the hand is worth zillions.
0

#6 User is offline   jdonn 

  • - - T98765432 AQT8
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 15,085
  • Joined: 2005-June-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Las Vegas, NV

Posted 2009-November-16, 10:48

I think we can all agree, looks like exactly what you want for 3♦.
Please let me know about any questions or interest or bug reports about GIB.
0

#7 User is offline   aguahombre 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,029
  • Joined: 2009-February-21
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:St. George, UT

Posted 2009-November-16, 10:58

3D, unless you are shellshocked by pard's previous takeout doubles.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
0

#8 User is offline   benlessard 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,465
  • Joined: 2006-January-07
  • Location:Montreal Canada
  • Interests:All games. i really mean all of them.

Posted 2009-November-16, 11:07

3D and even if its going down youre probably ok because they are likely to reach a making 2S or 2H if you only bid 2D.

(1H)-----X--------(P)---------2D
(X)-------P--------(2S)

or

(1H)-----X--------(P)---------2D
(P)-------P--------(X) (with 4/5S 2H + little values)
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
0

#9 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2009-November-16, 12:08

3♦ WTP?
0

#10 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,093
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2009-November-16, 12:11

3♦. This is a minimum.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#11 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2009-November-16, 13:26

whereagles, on Nov 16 2009, 02:25 PM, said:

3 seems like a no-brainer. If pard has a 4144 (even if min) the hand is worth zillions.

That's a very 1980s argument. Are people even dealt 4144 shapes over 1♥ any more?
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#12 User is offline   whereagles 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,900
  • Joined: 2004-May-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Portugal
  • Interests:Everything!

Posted 2009-November-16, 13:41

gnasher, on Nov 16 2009, 07:26 PM, said:

whereagles, on Nov 16 2009, 02:25 PM, said:

3 seems like a no-brainer. If pard has a 4144 (even if min) the hand is worth zillions.

That's a very 1980s argument. Are people even dealt 4144 shapes over 1♥ any more?

They are. Usually in the 9-10 hcp range. Doesn't stop them from doubling :rolleyes:
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users