♠1087xxx
♥KJ10x
♦7x
♣9
All vul, east dealer
(1♦)-ps-(1♠)-2NT
(ps)-4♥-(5♦)-ps
(ps)-ps
Page 1 of 1
lead against 5 diamonds
#2
Posted 2011-January-11, 17:20
♣9, singleton in partner's suit.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
#3
Posted 2011-January-11, 18:39
♣9, blame Garozzo (or maybe partner) if wrong
Yay for the "Ignored Users" feature!
#5
Posted 2011-January-12, 09:13
Use the bridge version of Occam's razor; "the defense that requires the least number of complications will work most often"
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"
"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."
George Bernard Shaw
#7
Posted 2011-January-12, 19:10
655321, on 2011-January-11, 17:20, said:
♣9, singleton in partner's suit.
I loled.
If partner had a spade void and enough to beat this I think he would often rip this and hope we had enough spade length to work this out (likely since they didn't bid 4S).
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#8
Posted 2011-January-12, 19:12
The HK is pretty interesting actually. We lose to some layouts like partner having the black aces though.
blogging at http://www.justinlall.com
#9
Posted 2011-January-13, 07:35
I tried ♥K wich wasn't a succes, partner had ♠- ♥Qxxxx ♦xx ♣AQJ9xxx
Dummy had ♠AQJx ♥x ♦HHxx ♣Kxxx so defence is still not obvious after a club lead, in fact ♥K lead only costed me 1 IMP. Also spade lead leaves some work to do.
Dummy had ♠AQJx ♥x ♦HHxx ♣Kxxx so defence is still not obvious after a club lead, in fact ♥K lead only costed me 1 IMP. Also spade lead leaves some work to do.
Page 1 of 1