Playing today in an ACBL Robot Tourney, my Robot partner responded to my 1♥ opening with 1NT holding:
KQJ9842
K82
42
2
and then bid 3♥ after I bid 2♦.
It seems reasonable to mention the spade suit at some point in this auction.
Page 1 of 1
Forcing 1NT?
#2
Posted 2011-October-20, 16:28
The bot must have learned that style at our club. I can understand sometimes raising hearts with six spades and 3 hearts, but bidding 1nt is just a misprogram with 7-3.
"Bidding Spades to show spades can work well." (Kenberg)
#3
Posted 2011-October-20, 17:29
Posts #1 and #5 in this other thread also show hands where North bid forcing 1NT rather than show spades. Neither is as dramatic as yours, but definitely a theme.
http://www.bridgebas...ush-on-flannery
http://www.bridgebas...ush-on-flannery
#4
Posted 2011-October-20, 21:48
Support with support. If you can't figure out that partner has seven spades, then that's your problem.
"Gibberish in, gibberish out. A trial judge, three sets of lawyers, and now three appellate judges cannot agree on what this law means. And we ask police officers, prosecutors, defense lawyers, and citizens to enforce or abide by it? The legislature continues to write unreadable statutes. Gibberish should not be enforced as law."
-P.J. Painter.
-P.J. Painter.
#5
Posted 2011-October-23, 12:01
Looks to me like the rule to start with forcing 1NT to show a 3-card limit raise is somehow taking precedence over showing spades. The correct way to show this hand is with
1♥-1♠
<any>-3♥
1♥-1♠
<any>-3♥
Page 1 of 1