BBO Discussion Forums: what are we playing for? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

what are we playing for? funky NT range

#1 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2013-February-03, 09:18

matchpoints, spade 5 was led (attitude), dummy played low.

... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#2 User is offline   mr1303 

  • Admirer of Walter the Walrus
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,563
  • Joined: 2003-November-14
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia
  • Interests:Bridge, surfing, water skiing, cricket, golf. Generally being outside really.

Posted 2013-February-03, 09:21

Awkward.

The 2 and the 4 are out there. If partner has one or both, we need to win and play a club. If declarer has both, we need to duck and hopefully run spades later.

I think I'll win and play a club.
0

#3 User is offline   the_clown 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 645
  • Joined: 2010-December-02

Posted 2013-February-03, 14:07

I would play the 9. I dont think partner has 532, this will leave declarer with QJ10xx. And if he has that he is playing another spade at trick 2.
Only danger is that partner has 10532. But I think he should lead the 3 even from this holding and play the 2 in the next round if he wants a switch.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users