Page 1 of 1
Auction Termination Hand 5
#1
Posted 2013-July-27, 09:19
Relay Responder
♠ A6543
♥ 3
♦ AKQ7
♣ 976
Relay Asker
♠ KQ2
♥ AQT94
♦ 82
♣ AKJ
♠ A6543
♥ 3
♦ AKQ7
♣ 976
Relay Asker
♠ KQ2
♥ AQT94
♦ 82
♣ AKJ
Alderaan delenda est
#2
Posted 2013-July-27, 10:24
hrothgar, on 2013-July-27, 09:19, said:
Relay Responder
♠ A6543
♥ 3
♦ AKQ7
♣ 976
Relay Asker
♠ KQ2
♥ AQT94
♦ 82
♣ AKJ
♠ A6543
♥ 3
♦ AKQ7
♣ 976
Relay Asker
♠ KQ2
♥ AQT94
♦ 82
♣ AKJ
MOSCITO auction
3♥ - 4♦
4♥ - 4N
5♣ - 5♦
5♥ - 5♠
5N - 6♣
6♠
3H asks for slam points
4♦ shows 9
4H starts the scan
4N shows 1-2 controls in Hearts and 0-3 in Diamonds
At this point in time, RR is marked with A of Spades and AKQ of Diamonds
5C asks in clubs
5D shows 0-3 controls in Clubs
5H asks in Spades
5S shows 1 spade control
5N asks in Diamonds
6C denies the Jack of Diamonds
At this point in time, further searches for the grand seem unreasonable so relay captain places the contract (and hopes that RR doesn't have the stiff K of Hearts)
Alderaan delenda est
#3
Posted 2013-July-27, 10:33
... 3♦ (shape)
3♥ - 4♦ (QP ask, 9QP)
4♥ - 5♣ (ask, one or three top spades and one or three top diamonds and zero or two top clubs)
This means Axxxx x AKQx xxx plus maybe some jacks. I'm glad to have the knowledge that partner doesn't have ♥K.
6♠ - Pass
3♥ - 4♦ (QP ask, 9QP)
4♥ - 5♣ (ask, one or three top spades and one or three top diamonds and zero or two top clubs)
This means Axxxx x AKQx xxx plus maybe some jacks. I'm glad to have the knowledge that partner doesn't have ♥K.
6♠ - Pass
Adam W. Meyerson
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
a.k.a. Appeal Without Merit
#6
Posted 2013-July-27, 13:34
hrothgar, on 2013-July-27, 09:19, said:
Relay Responder
♠ A6543
♥ 3
♦ AKQ7
♣ 976
Relay Asker
♠ KQ2
♥ AQT94
♦ 82
♣ AKJ
♠ A6543
♥ 3
♦ AKQ7
♣ 976
Relay Asker
♠ KQ2
♥ AQT94
♦ 82
♣ AKJ
Ultra Club Relay / Copious Canape Club (C3)
Same sequence as #4, the Q♦ can not be found and since ♦ are only 4-cards, the fit is less important.
1♣ 16+ - 1♥ = 4+ ♠ or 4♠ & 5♣/♦
1♠ RELAY - 2♥ = 5♠ & 4♣/♦
2 ♠ RELAY - 3♦ = 5=1=x=x
3♠ BETA - 4♠ = 5 controls (missing 1 red K)
5♦ CAB - 6♥ = AK♦ (missing K♥)
6♠ May need flat distribution
Ultra ♣ Relay: see Daniel's web page: https://bridgewithda...19/07/Ultra.pdf
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)
Santa Fe Precision ♣ published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail ♣. 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified ♣ (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary ♣ Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape.
C3: Copious Canape Club is still my favorite system. (Ultra upgraded, PM for notes)
Santa Fe Precision ♣ published 8/19. TOP3 published 11/20. Magic experiment (Science Modernized) with Lenzo. 2020: Jan Eric Larsson's Cottontail ♣. 2020. BFUN (Bridge For the UNbalanced) 2021: Weiss Simplified ♣ (Canape & Relay). 2022: Canary ♣ Modernized, 2023-4: KOK Canape.
#7
Posted 2013-July-27, 15:14
3H--4C (S kc, 2noQ)
4D--4S (Kd, yes but no Kc)
4Nt--5D (QD ? yes but no QC)
5H --5S (extras ?--no)
7S (mp and 6S imps)
if north has K of H ill play 7nt.
idem for method 2.
In CC i finish also in 3D.
1C-1H-1S-2C-2D-2H*-2S-3D 5143
2H is a reverser S longer or equal that D.
4D--4S (Kd, yes but no Kc)
4Nt--5D (QD ? yes but no QC)
5H --5S (extras ?--no)
7S (mp and 6S imps)
if north has K of H ill play 7nt.
idem for method 2.
In CC i finish also in 3D.
1C-1H-1S-2C-2D-2H*-2S-3D 5143
2H is a reverser S longer or equal that D.
From Psych "I mean, Gus and I never see eye-to-eye on work stuff.
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
For instance, he doesn't like being used as a human shield when we're being shot at.
I happen to think it's a very noble way to meet one's maker, especially for a guy like him.
Bottom line is we never let that difference of opinion interfere with anything."
#8
Posted 2013-July-27, 15:24
hrothgar, on 2013-July-27, 09:19, said:
Relay Responder
♠ A6543
♥ 3
♦ AKQ7
♣ 976
Relay Asker
♠ KQ2
♥ AQT94
♦ 82
♣ AKJ
♠ A6543
♥ 3
♦ AKQ7
♣ 976
Relay Asker
♠ KQ2
♥ AQT94
♦ 82
♣ AKJ
...3♦
With the weak doubleton and a 2 outside losers, it's difficult to see us going anywhere without some Ace power. However, if we RKC, we might in over our heads at the 5-level, so it's seems best to use the QP ask.
...3H...4♦ (QP ask; 9 QPs)
...4♥...4N (DCB; ♠ control, AKQ of ♦ or nothing)
...6♠ (can't picture 9 QP hand without AKQ of ♦+A♠)
foobar on BBO
#9
Posted 2013-July-28, 12:39
(PCB with control parity)
3♥ - 4♦ (QP? - 9QP)
4♥ - 4N (control parity? - odd, even KQJ in ♠)
At this point, responder possible hands are: Axxxx j AKQj xxx, Axxxx j AKjx Qxx, Axxxx K AQjx xxx, Axxxx K Ajxx Qxx. All hands are safe for small slam, with the first hand holding DJ has some minor chances for 7 (I would go for it needing a swing, I rate it at about 60% (68% for 3-2 break + HK coming down in three rounds or C finesse or H-C squeeze (I estimate this to be about 85%); higher with SJ, which has already been denied).
5♣ - 5♦ (D parity? - even KQJ in ♦)
6♠
This hand reveals a flaw in the method, that it cannot differentiate between Axxxx J AKQx xxx vs Axxxx K AQJx xxx. Did not matter here but there will certainly be hands where it would. Maybe instead of PCB, one should use DCB with TOSR rules over KQJ instead of KQJ parity.
3♥ - 4♦ (QP? - 9QP)
4♥ - 4N (control parity? - odd, even KQJ in ♠)
At this point, responder possible hands are: Axxxx j AKQj xxx, Axxxx j AKjx Qxx, Axxxx K AQjx xxx, Axxxx K Ajxx Qxx. All hands are safe for small slam, with the first hand holding DJ has some minor chances for 7 (I would go for it needing a swing, I rate it at about 60% (68% for 3-2 break + HK coming down in three rounds or C finesse or H-C squeeze (I estimate this to be about 85%); higher with SJ, which has already been denied).
5♣ - 5♦ (D parity? - even KQJ in ♦)
6♠
This hand reveals a flaw in the method, that it cannot differentiate between Axxxx J AKQx xxx vs Axxxx K AQJx xxx. Did not matter here but there will certainly be hands where it would. Maybe instead of PCB, one should use DCB with TOSR rules over KQJ instead of KQJ parity.
#10
Posted 2013-July-29, 10:38
Same as Richard. This hand shows again that it's very annoying not to know if the singleton is a top honor.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
Page 1 of 1