BBO Discussion Forums: Responding to t/o double of 3D - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Responding to t/o double of 3D

Poll: What's your call after partner doubles 3D? (27 member(s) have cast votes)

What's your call?

  1. 3S (19 votes [70.37%])

    Percentage of vote: 70.37%

  2. 4S (2 votes [7.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.41%

  3. 3NT (4 votes [14.81%])

    Percentage of vote: 14.81%

  4. Pass (2 votes [7.41%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.41%

  5. 4D (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 User is offline   jallerton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,796
  • Joined: 2008-September-12
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-January-26, 12:42

IMPS


Love All. IMPs, Knock-out match. What do you call now?
0

#2 User is offline   eagles123 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Joined: 2011-June-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK Near London
  • Interests:Crystal Palace

Posted 2014-January-26, 13:35

either pass or 3N... hmmm think i'll try pass :)
"definitely that's what I like to play when I'm playing standard - I want to be able to bid diamonds because bidding good suits is important in bridge" - Meckstroth's opinion on weak 2 diamond
0

#3 User is offline   PeterAlan 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 614
  • Joined: 2010-May-03
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-January-26, 14:00

4♠, assuming partner is showing both majors. Ideally I'd like a bit more information on (a) how we use X in this sequence, and (b) opponents' pre-empt style, but without that this is what I'd choose. It should have good chances, and I see no reason to suppose we're taking 500 from 3♦X.
0

#4 User is offline   broze 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,001
  • Joined: 2011-March-08
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:UK

Posted 2014-January-26, 14:31

3♠. Unless p's takeout doubles are VERY sound (and whose are these days) 3♠ should be enough. If p has extra shape or values he will be aggressive to raise to four. No reason to suspect we are getting rich in 3Dx (but it would be a good shot at MP I think); 3N is a total gamble and could easily miss 4S.
'In an infinite universe, the one thing sentient life cannot afford to have is a sense of proportion.' - Douglas Adams
0

#5 User is offline   ArtK78 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 7,786
  • Joined: 2004-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Galloway NJ USA
  • Interests:Bridge, Poker, participatory and spectator sports.
    Occupation - Tax Attorney in Atlantic City, NJ.

Posted 2014-January-26, 15:27

If the minors were reversed I would probably bid 4♠. As it is, I think that 3♠ is enough.

3NT may be the winning call, but if you have to let RHO on lead at some point 3NT could very well have no play.
0

#6 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2014-January-26, 18:03

3S. Close to 4.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#7 User is offline   jallerton 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,796
  • Joined: 2008-September-12
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2014-February-08, 16:03

Thanks for the replies.

4♠ was selected at the table. This was not a success when partner had also stretched to double on Jxx KQ8xx x AQxx.

I was asked to assign the blame, but I thought that Advancer's problem was quite interesting.
0
Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users