Novice: bidding systems
#3
Posted 2015-May-04, 05:51
Do you have a partner, a mentor?
Trying to learn the game via Forum questions, is not a good way, the
forum can supplement, but never fully compensate a reasonable teacher.
With kind regards
Marlowe
Uwe Gebhardt (P_Marlowe)
#5
Posted 2015-May-04, 06:37
http://www.bridgebas...e-should-learn/
#6
Posted 2015-May-04, 10:22
99_lvl, on 2015-May-04, 04:09, said:
welcome to the forums.
Where you live is very important, if playing face to face bridge is important to you, because there are tremendous regional variations.
In NA, the 'basic' approach would be what is known as Standard American, also known as 'standard'. Don't be confused by players who profess to play something known as SAYC, which is an acronym for Standard American Yellow Card, which was an ill-fated attempt by the ACBL to offer a simplified, standardized bidding method for use by relatively inexperienced players. I gather that it has seen a bit of a revival online, but I also gather that in reality few of those players who claim to use SAYC actually know what it is. In any event, what it is, is bad bridge, so don't try to learn it.
In the UK, I gather the norm is Acol, which has fundamentally different underlying ideas than does Standard American. Poland would see you learning Polish Club methods, etc.
If you are planning to play mostly online, then the odds are that learning some form of 2/1 would be useful, tho it might be easier to learn Standard American first, and then move to 2/1 once you have a farily good grasp of standard methods. That would reflect the way 2/1 was developed....2/1 is an outgrowth of standard American, not an entirely new system.
Once you have decided what basic approach you want, find (at least) one book on the method, and study the book. If you can find local lessons, aimed at your level, sign up for them (and see what books or other resources they follow/use).
As for the forums, my suggestion is that you feel free to post as much as you want, in this part of the forum, and learn to recognize those posters who know what they are talking about. However, it can be very difficult to provide a full explanation in answer to a specific post. Some topics simply require more space, and more interaction, than can be accomplished in a forum like this, so having a live human with whom you can discuss things is very important.
As for choosing a teacher, make sure that you know whether the teacher is following a plan based on well-regarded materials. In NA, there is a series of books put out by Audrey Grant, who is a wonderful writer of books aimed at the novice and advancing player (disclaimer....I know Audrey and am a big fan of her as a person). I don't know about other areas of the world. This is important because some who teach are not very strong players themselves, and so you want the comfort of knowing that what is being taught is in fact a consensus method rather than the perhaps idiosyncratic personal preferences of the teacher. I am not knocking the teachers....one doesn't need to be an expert in order to be an excellent teacher of novices and intermediates. Indeed, some of the best players I know would, imo, likely be terrible teachers, because they have forgotten what it was like to not be expert.
#7
Posted 2015-May-05, 05:14
99_lvl, on 2015-May-04, 04:09, said:
From my experince the best bidding systems are Standard Amerciam Acol and Benjamised Acol
- Dr Tarrasch(1862-1934)German Chess Grandmaster
Bridge is a game where you have two opponents...and often three(!)
"Any palooka can take tricks with Aces and Kings; the true expert shows his prowess
by how he handles the two's and three's" - Mollo's Hideous Hog
#8
Posted 2015-May-05, 11:08
#9
Posted 2015-May-05, 12:01
#10
Posted 2015-May-05, 13:25
Second, when you need to figure out who is giving better advice than another, look for the one who talks of probabilities. On a given hand, you may be right to get to 6!S and yet go down; on another hand, you may make 6!S but should have bid no more than 4!S or 5!S. WHat determines what is right? Not what worked on this hand, but what will work more often (simplification there; there are actually different odds depending on the form of scoring, but you still need to stick with percentages, not just "we went down, so we shouldn't have been there")
Third, Do yourself and your partners a favor and learn to understand the ACBL convention card (or the variant for your country/region). Fill one out according to your favorite system, and post it when you play on BBO, and let your partner know that you're using it. If your partner says "huh?" or lists himself as "advanced" or better but doesn't know what a convention card is (or says, "see my profile"), then move on when you can without being rude. A convention card is an expression of your philosophy of bidding, or is like a dictionary. Without one, when you say "bonnet", you mean hat, and when your partner says it, he means "the thing you lift up to see the car's engine". You'll have much more fun if you both agree -- and far fewer disasters. Note: It may seem daunting at first, just work through as much as you can, and talk with your partner about the stuff you don't know.
Fourth, find a regular partner that you can grow with. This will often be someone about your skill level. It will be someone who doesn't criticize you. It will be someone who doesn't only look at your results to see if you made a mistake. It will be someone who will share an interest with you in discussing results *after* your session is over (discussing hands during a session only distracts you from the next board, and never helps you get a better score on the last board!). It is also extremely helpful if your partner agrees to read the same 2/1 book as you, and agrees to use what it says as your agreements, until you get comfortable with that, and good enough to know when changing an established system makes sense.
BTW: An early post in this discussion is right; there are only a few essential conventions (assuming you don't play a system like 2/1. Work on developing hand evaluation skills before you add a lot of gadgets to your bidding. But a "system" (as I suspect you know) is not a list of conventions, it's a bidding philosophy. "System" is to "convention" as "automobile" is to "spark plug"
#13
Posted 2015-May-14, 13:34
dae, on 2015-May-05, 12:01, said:
Thank you! Very useful!
#14
Posted 2015-May-14, 13:39
SelfGovern, on 2015-May-05, 13:25, said:
Second, when you need to figure out who is giving better advice than another, look for the one who talks of probabilities. On a given hand, you may be right to get to 6!S and yet go down; on another hand, you may make 6!S but should have bid no more than 4!S or 5!S. WHat determines what is right? Not what worked on this hand, but what will work more often (simplification there; there are actually different odds depending on the form of scoring, but you still need to stick with percentages, not just "we went down, so we shouldn't have been there")
Third, Do yourself and your partners a favor and learn to understand the ACBL convention card (or the variant for your country/region). Fill one out according to your favorite system, and post it when you play on BBO, and let your partner know that you're using it. If your partner says "huh?" or lists himself as "advanced" or better but doesn't know what a convention card is (or says, "see my profile"), then move on when you can without being rude. A convention card is an expression of your philosophy of bidding, or is like a dictionary. Without one, when you say "bonnet", you mean hat, and when your partner says it, he means "the thing you lift up to see the car's engine". You'll have much more fun if you both agree -- and far fewer disasters. Note: It may seem daunting at first, just work through as much as you can, and talk with your partner about the stuff you don't know.
Fourth, find a regular partner that you can grow with. This will often be someone about your skill level. It will be someone who doesn't criticize you. It will be someone who doesn't only look at your results to see if you made a mistake. It will be someone who will share an interest with you in discussing results *after* your session is over (discussing hands during a session only distracts you from the next board, and never helps you get a better score on the last board!). It is also extremely helpful if your partner agrees to read the same 2/1 book as you, and agrees to use what it says as your agreements, until you get comfortable with that, and good enough to know when changing an established system makes sense.
BTW: An early post in this discussion is right; there are only a few essential conventions (assuming you don't play a system like 2/1. Work on developing hand evaluation skills before you add a lot of gadgets to your bidding. But a "system" (as I suspect you know) is not a list of conventions, it's a bidding philosophy. "System" is to "convention" as "automobile" is to "spark plug"
A very good piece of advice! Helped a lot!!
#15
Posted 2015-May-14, 13:40
helene_t, on 2015-May-04, 06:37, said:
http://www.bridgebas...e-should-learn/
#18
Posted 2015-May-15, 16:22