Stephen Tu, on 2017-November-02, 15:43, said:
The description could be improved here certainly, but you have to give the programmers a certain amount of leeway for a very difficult task. It's really hard to programatically generate accurate descriptions for every single auction under the sun. You write a bunch of rules, attach descriptions to the rules, then as the rules are triggered you combine the descriptions in some way and hope to spit out something intelligible.
For one, the description said 12+ total points, not 12- total points. That means 12 or more, not 12 exactly. You misread if you thought the top end was limited.
I have to blame this result on you though, you should have been able to work it out:
- you could have overcalled to begin with
- cue bid in response to double really ought to promise a rebid
- logically if North had no 4 cd major and 11-14 hcp, stopper in diamond, should have balanced 1nt not double so must be stronger than that. Interpreting as 12 total points max makes no sense.
It would be more accurate if the description said 15+, but the bid did match its description here.
Before I respond, are you, Stephen, part of the programming team?
vrock