BBO Discussion Forums: Support with support - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Support with support

#1 User is offline   thorvald 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 376
  • Joined: 2012-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2022-November-05, 17:51

Perhaps I am influenced by the actual board, but this looks wrong to me




Once again the bot passed
Thorvald Aagaard
Mobile : +45 22 99 55 25
http://www.netbridge.dk
http://www.thorvald.dk
0

#2 User is offline   thorvald 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 376
  • Joined: 2012-September-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2022-November-05, 18:00

Perhaps GIB is just having a bad day

This sequence is know to cost partnerships, so perhaps I should follow Stephen Merrimans advice and stop plyaing with the bots



Over 2 3 seems to follow the normal bridge rules, and Pass seems just wrong.

Now the explanation of 2 and 3 is the same, but the bot punishes partner for competing.

Interesting this hand came up just a few boards later


So now the hand is worth 2N
Thorvald Aagaard
Mobile : +45 22 99 55 25
http://www.netbridge.dk
http://www.thorvald.dk
0

#3 User is offline   smerriman 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 4,730
  • Joined: 2014-March-15
  • Gender:Male

Posted 2022-November-05, 18:43

View Postthorvald, on 2022-November-05, 18:00, said:

perhaps I should follow Stephen Merrimans advice and stop plyaing with the bots

*free

I've been misquoted :)

Though sadly most of these are issues with the advanced bots too :( The first older GIB finds the trivial 4 raise, but modern GIB apparently doesn't even simulate. The latter appears due to the 2 bid only promising 3 clubs, so it wants 5 to raise (modern GIB also can't raise so doubles 2 instead).
I have nothing worth contributing, bye
0

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users