IMP Pairs
one bid
				
						#1
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 09:11
IMP Pairs
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
				
						#2
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 09:43
				
						#3
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 09:45
I will apologize to partner if we make 4
				
						#5
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 09:53
I don't need to post this, I'm just having a bitch.
I played, some would say badly, in one session of the local sectional this last weekend.
This hand had me stop recording the scores on my sheet. -10.19
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
				
						#6
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 09:58
Sorry if this is wildly different from what happened at the table. I think if there's a difference in how the hand was evaluated no number of bidding rounds is going to produce convergent choices.
				
						#7
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 11:06
"though partner really shouldn't play us for a hand we've denied". I didn't
Please, please partners, stop this "I'll show my hand next round" rubbish.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
				
						#9
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 11:58
DavidKok, on 2025-May-19, 11:24, said:
Agree
bunny bashing ?
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
				
						#10
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 12:57
				
						#13
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 13:59
mike777, on 2025-May-19, 13:45, said:
why?
for me this is a normal constructive raise..I overbid one level when someone preempts, hope this helps...
3 ♠ is super, any sign of life is super.
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
				
						#15
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 14:00
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
				
						#16
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 14:05
				
						#17
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 14:09
smerriman, on 2025-May-19, 14:05, said:
What is wrong with X?
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"
				
						#18
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 14:13
				
						#20
						
								
							  
								
						
					
				
				Posted 2025-May-19, 22:27
To be honest, I didn't consider 3N or pass. DSIP X - am I masterminding?
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
If you are my partner, please never tell me "I play the rule of (insert #)"

 Help
			
		