BBO Discussion Forums: More high level decisions - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

More high level decisions

#21 User is offline   jillybean 

  • hooked
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 12,228
  • Joined: 2003-November-15
  • Gender:Female
  • Location:Vancouver, Canada
  • Interests:Multi

Posted Yesterday, 23:10

View Postakwoo, on 2026-May-07, 22:06, said:

My 4♥ favorable openings look like x KQxxxxx xxx xx. That is not a normal 4♥ opener, especially favorable.


yes, this looks more like it.

We just picked up 11imp after I bid 4♠ NV vs. V after 1♠ (P) ...

97652, 75, T43, 632
"And no matter what methods you play, it is essential, for anyone aspiring to learn to be a good player, to learn the importance of bidding shape properly. MikeH
"100% certain that many excellent players would disagree. This is far more about style/judgment than right vs. wrong." Fred
"Hysterical Raisins again - this time on the World stage, not just the ACBL" mycroft
0

#22 User is offline   mikeh 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,656
  • Joined: 2005-June-15
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Canada
  • Interests:Bridge, golf, wine (red), cooking, reading eclectically but insatiably, travelling, making bad posts.

Posted Yesterday, 23:54

Btw, after 4H (4S) I can’t imagine not bidding 5H as north. In what universe is 4S likely to fail? Bear in mind that even if 4H was a permissible bid for this partnership, surely the vast majority of 4H bids, at favourable, have less defence.
'one of the great markers of the advance of human kindness is the howls you will hear from the Men of God' Johann Hari
1

#23 User is offline   pescetom 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 9,744
  • Joined: 2014-February-18
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Italy

Posted Today, 12:27

View Postjillybean, on 2026-May-07, 18:52, said:

I asked South at the OT about his 4♥ opening bid

“That is a normal 4♥ opener, less than 8.5 tricks when namyats would kick in.”

I don’t have namyats

That is a Namyats for me. It would already be too heavy for 4♥ even not playing Namyats.
Did his partner alert the inference that he did not bid Namyats?
I know ACBL are not on that bandwagon but it seems to me necessary if they did not present a card.
0

#24 User is online   DavidKok 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,432
  • Joined: 2020-March-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Netherlands

Posted Today, 12:40

Oh no, another gadget. No wonder the hand evaluation is all over the place.
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

6 User(s) are reading this topic
1 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users

  1. alibodin