BBO Discussion Forums: Preempt 2H? - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Preempt 2H?

#1 User is offline   Little Kid 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 323
  • Joined: 2008-May-26
  • Location:London
  • Interests:Genetic Engineering, Squash, Languages, Travelling, Table Tennis, Movies, Judo, Swimming, Scuba Diving, Climbing...

Posted 2010-June-07, 15:13

Scoring: XIMP

You deal and pick up this collection. Do you open 2?

Veni, vidi, proficisci
0

#2 User is offline   MFA 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,625
  • Joined: 2006-October-04
  • Location:Denmark

Posted 2010-June-07, 15:14

No.
Michael Askgaard
0

#3 User is offline   Phil 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,092
  • Joined: 2008-December-11
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:North Texas, USA
  • Interests:Mountain Biking

Posted 2010-June-07, 15:15

r/w? No thanks.
Hi y'all!

Winner - BBO Challenge bracket #6 - February, 2017.
0

#4 User is offline   OleBerg 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,950
  • Joined: 2008-April-05
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Copenhagen
  • Interests:Model-Railways.

Posted 2010-June-07, 15:16

Yes.
_____________________________________

Do not underestimate the power of the dark side. Or the ninth trumph.

Best Regards Ole Berg

_____________________________________

We should always assume 2/1 unless otherwise stated, because:

- If the original poster didn't bother to state his system, that means that he thinks it's obvious what he's playing. The only people who think this are 2/1 players.


Gnasher
0

#5 User is offline   Little Kid 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 323
  • Joined: 2008-May-26
  • Location:London
  • Interests:Genetic Engineering, Squash, Languages, Travelling, Table Tennis, Movies, Judo, Swimming, Scuba Diving, Climbing...

Posted 2010-June-07, 16:35

Scoring: XIMP

Pass - (Pass) - 1 -  (2NT*)
Pass - (3**) - Pass -(4)
Pass - (5) - All Pass

* Minors
** Alerted: Cuebid

You are playing against a strong pair, ATB?
Veni, vidi, proficisci
0

#6 User is offline   Fluffy 

  • World International Master without a clue
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 17,404
  • Joined: 2003-November-13
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:madrid

Posted 2010-June-07, 16:45

North should dobule 5, you have a white/red overcaller who didn't get excited opposite the cuebid against a passed hand bidder, and he has 3 very likelly tricks.
0

#7 User is offline   neilkaz 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,568
  • Joined: 2006-June-28
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Barrington IL USA
  • Interests:Backgammon, Bridge, Hockey

Posted 2010-June-07, 16:46

I like to preempt but no way here R vs W at IMPs.

Even if my were and noting that 2 forces the opps to come in at the 3 level in a suit whereas 2 allows the opps to easily enter with 2, I'd still pass at IMPs.
0

#8 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2010-June-07, 17:10

Little Kid, on Jun 7 2010, 05:35 PM, said:

You are playing against a strong pair, ATB?

This isn't much of an ATB is it?

North can see 3 tricks and ought to double which will turn 100 into 300, not a huge triumph but you are never getting 620, and South can't do anything. If the opponents had stopped in 4 and played there you might have a more interesting ATB.

(If you have a way to show a weak weak 2 as south I would be happy to do that, opponents would probably be shut out now, but otherwise I think 2 is too much.)
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#9 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,330
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2010-June-07, 17:15

655321, on Jun 7 2010, 06:10 PM, said:

Little Kid, on Jun 7 2010, 05:35 PM, said:

You are playing against a strong pair, ATB?

This isn't much of an ATB is it?

North can see 3 tricks and ought to double which will turn 100 into 300, not a huge triumph but you are never getting 620, and South can't do anything. If the opponents had stopped in 4 and played there you might have a more interesting ATB.

Never getting 620 ? Isn't 2H-P-4H end possible here.

I would open 2H, but then I'd open it on a much worse hand than that.
0

#10 User is offline   655321 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,502
  • Joined: 2007-December-22

Posted 2010-June-07, 17:29

Cyberyeti, on Jun 7 2010, 06:15 PM, said:

I would open 2H, but then I'd open it on a much worse hand than that.

Yes, I always feel it is a mistake to post the whole deal and expect that we won't be subconsciously influenced by knowing the par contract.
That's impossible. No one can give more than one hundred percent. By definition that is the most anyone can give.
0

#11 User is offline   pooltuna 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 3,814
  • Joined: 2009-July-23
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:New Orleans

Posted 2010-June-07, 17:41

Little Kid, on Jun 7 2010, 04:13 PM, said:

Scoring: XIMP

You deal and pick up this collection. Do you open 2?

sorry but I try to save my suicidal urges for better hands :)
"Tell me of your home world, Usul"
the Freman, Chani from the move "Dune"

"I learned long ago, never to wrestle with a pig. You get dirty, and besides, the pig likes it."

George Bernard Shaw
0

#12 User is offline   gnasher 

  • Andy Bowles
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 11,993
  • Joined: 2007-May-03
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:London, UK

Posted 2010-June-07, 18:06

No, I wouldn't open 2.

Regarding the rest of the auction, if West had passed 4, North would have passed too, presumably, and NS would have got a miserable 50 in exchange for their vulnerable game.

What should a double of 3 be? When South doesn't immediately support spades, the suit where we're most likely to have a fit is hearts. In that case, maybe double should be for takeout of the minors, ie showing hearts.

It's vaguely similar to this double:
  1 1 pass 2
  dbl
which I play as a takeout double of spades.
... that would still not be conclusive proof, before someone wants to explain that to me as well as if I was a 5 year-old. - gwnn
0

#13 User is offline   y66 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 6,496
  • Joined: 2006-February-24

Posted 2010-June-07, 21:09

Open 2H r/w? Yes
If you lose all hope, you can always find it again -- Richard Ford in The Sportswriter
0

#14 User is offline   mich-b 

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 584
  • Joined: 2008-November-27

Posted 2010-June-08, 01:09

Would not open 2. We need a better suit VUL.
(Yes, I see that opening 2 might have worked better when partner had a great fit for s. )
0

#15 User is offline   the hog 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-March-07
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Laos
  • Interests:Wagner and Bridge

Posted 2010-June-08, 01:42

Little Kid, on Jun 8 2010, 04:13 AM, said:

Scoring: XIMP

You deal and pick up this collection. Do you open 2?

NV vs V certainly. At other vulnerabilities, no.
"The King of Hearts a broadsword bears, the Queen of Hearts a rose." W. H. Auden.
0

#16 User is online   Cyberyeti 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 14,330
  • Joined: 2009-July-13
  • Location:England

Posted 2010-June-08, 02:18

655321, on Jun 7 2010, 06:29 PM, said:

Cyberyeti, on Jun 7 2010, 06:15 PM, said:

I would open 2H, but then I'd open it on a much worse hand than that.

Yes, I always feel it is a mistake to post the whole deal and expect that we won't be subconsciously influenced by knowing the par contract.

At other vulnerabilities my partner and I would open a weak 2 on xxxx in 1st or 3rd, at this one 6 small and 4 small is routine for us. I meant what I said about opening hands far worse than that.
0

#17 User is offline   andy_h 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 1,962
  • Joined: 2007-September-14
  • Location:Australia
  • Interests:The Universe, Traveling, Squash, and Scandinavia.

Posted 2010-June-08, 02:56

R/W no.
- Andy -

We are all connected to each other biologically, to the Earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.
We're in the universe, and the universe is in us.
0

#18 User is offline   Little Kid 

  • PipPipPipPip
  • Group: Full Members
  • Posts: 323
  • Joined: 2008-May-26
  • Location:London
  • Interests:Genetic Engineering, Squash, Languages, Travelling, Table Tennis, Movies, Judo, Swimming, Scuba Diving, Climbing...

Posted 2010-June-08, 04:17

Yes, I should have let the final contract be 4, is anyone to blame then? Never considered the dbl of 3 as being take out but I suppose it is more useful? Yet it doesn't look like we could have gotten to 4 if the opponents resided in 4, assuming we don't have the option of doubling 4 for take out.

I admit I was a bit too conservative when not doubling 5 but I had figured they realised we were not competing over 4 so probably had a nice cross ruff going for bidding 5 :lol:
Veni, vidi, proficisci
0

#19 User is offline   gwnn 

  • Csaba the Hutt
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 13,027
  • Joined: 2006-June-16
  • Gender:Male
  • Interests:bye

Posted 2010-June-08, 04:37

Well I bid 3 over 2NT. soo me.
... and I can prove it with my usual, flawless logic.
      George Carlin
0

#20 User is offline   dake50 

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 2,211
  • Joined: 2006-April-22

Posted 2010-June-08, 08:50

Sound weak2's. Deviate when 0-1 other Major; plus for 4-2 not 3-3 sides. Yup 2H.
0

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

14 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 14 guests, 0 anonymous users