BBO Discussion Forums: Forcing NT - What does this sequence mean - BBO Discussion Forums

Jump to content

  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Forcing NT - What does this sequence mean

#21 User is offline   Free 

  • mmm Duvel
  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Group: Advanced Members
  • Posts: 10,728
  • Joined: 2003-July-30
  • Gender:Male
  • Location:Belgium
  • Interests:Duvel, Whisky

Posted 2011-January-27, 03:43

View Postpeachy, on 2011-January-26, 20:25, said:

Not true. It is a matter of agreement, not an automatic part of 2/1. It is giving no headaches to play whatever major suit raise structures one chooses, none of them obstruct the system at all.

It's true that you can play whatever raise structure that you want ofcourse. One can play Gazzilli in 2/1 as well, but that doesn't mean 1♠-1NT-2♣ in standard 2/1 can be done with less than 3♣s.

Maybe it's a difference in culture. If I sit down and my partner says "2/1", then I consider 1M-2M constructive and 1M-1NT absolutely forcing which can also contain raises with 5-7HCP or invites.
"It may be rude to leave to go to the bathroom, but it's downright stupid to sit there and piss yourself" - blackshoe
0
  • 2 Pages +
  • 1
  • 2
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users