2015 NFL Thread
#201
Posted 2015-December-06, 17:34
-- Bertrand Russell
#202
Posted 2015-December-06, 17:34
#203
Posted 2015-December-07, 07:19
mgoetze, on 2015-December-04, 06:18, said:
I don't understand why defenses don't assign someone to be in front of the play. Everyone was behind the receiver, all he had to do was grab it. Saw the same thing in college this year.
-gwnn
#204
Posted 2015-December-07, 07:54
billw55, on 2015-December-07, 07:19, said:
Lions had two guys standing in no-man's land. Caldwell admitted they weren't playing the full hail mary defense (which would have included Calvin Johnson) because they underestimated Rodgers' arm strength.
-- Bertrand Russell
#206
Posted 2015-December-08, 17:28
Quote
According to the report, Murray thinks he isnt a good fit in Kellys offense and that changes havent been made to accommodate Murrays running style. Murray thinks its strange that he didnt play much on Sunday.
So much LOL in there. LOL Chip Kelly as a GM. LOL DeMarco Murray taking a lot of money, sucking, and whining. LOL owners even meeting with players about this kind of stuff. LOL running backs.
-- Bertrand Russell
#207
Posted 2015-December-08, 22:02
mgoetze, on 2015-December-08, 17:28, said:
mgoetze dropping truthbombs here
bed
#208
Posted 2015-December-17, 20:01
Also, I thought Case Keenum wasn't bad with the Texans, just the rest of the team kind of quit that season, and he's doing OK again tonight.
-- Bertrand Russell
#209
Posted 2015-December-19, 22:31
-- Bertrand Russell
#210
Posted 2015-December-20, 06:07
mgoetze, on 2015-December-19, 22:31, said:
But now it is good for the Cowboys to lose the remaining games. Get Romo fit again and make a new try next year - add a top quality WR, CB and NT and the team ought to be walking the NFC East.
#211
Posted 2015-December-20, 07:26
Zelandakh, on 2015-December-20, 06:07, said:
adding 3 top quality players at those positions is hoping for too much.
If teams could do that they would...
#212
Posted 2015-December-20, 07:55
mgoetze, on 2015-December-19, 22:31, said:
Haha, I was def rooting for us to lose. My dad said he couldn't do it and was rooting for us to win though. It is more fun to watch losing with Moore than CASSEL. Dude will at least YOLO it to dez and see what happens, Cassel throws picks when hes trying to throw the ball away.
#213
Posted 2015-December-27, 15:17
-- Bertrand Russell
#214
Posted 2015-December-28, 19:34
mgoetze, on 2015-December-27, 15:17, said:
Kicking off to start overtime? Seems pretty reasonable - it's a pretty close decision in average circumstances to begin with, defense seemed to rule the game, and if you managed to choose to play with the wind as well...
#215
Posted 2015-December-28, 19:42
From the Packers PoV.
Win and host Seattle
Lose and go to Washington
Which do you prefer ?
#216
Posted 2015-December-28, 23:53
bed
#217
Posted 2015-December-29, 00:09
jjbrr, on 2015-December-28, 23:53, said:
That would be too obvious. A superior way to do it would be to let the score end up tied, not try to score on your last possession, win the flip in OT, choose to kick, then instruct your defense to allow the opponents to score. O_o
#218
Posted 2015-December-29, 03:58
PhantomSac, on 2015-December-29, 00:09, said:
Still, would be easier/less injury risk to just go for two to win in regulation and throw an incomplete pass, followed by botching the onside kick.
#219
Posted 2015-December-29, 04:44
As for kicking, apparently since the rule change 50.7% of receiving teams have won in OT. Sounds close enough but probably a couple of percent go to tie games. Anyway, I think Slater just goofed by saying "we want to kick" rather than "we want to pick sides".
-- Bertrand Russell
#220
Posted 2015-December-29, 21:50
bed